Fairness, Individuality, and Free Riding

According to most contemporary theorists, free riding on the cooperative contributions of others is unfair. At the same time, obligations to contribute to cooperative schemes can compel conformity with conventional practices, and can do so to a degree that poses a real threat to individuality. This paper exposes this tension between fairness and individuality, and proposes a way to resolve it. The resolution depends on an alternative approach to understanding fairness—one that appeals to the relational goods fairness is meant to maintain. In particular, norms of fairness protect against the interactions within a relationship becoming disrespectful. Many instances of free riding are indeed disrespectful and hence unfair. But this is not always so: one can choose to live a lifestyle that fails to return the benefits their community provides without disrespecting one's fellows. It is thus possible to free ride without being unfair, and so duties of fairness need not add to those already formidable forces that threaten to extinguish valuable individuality

Conformity · Economics · Free rider problem · Free riding · Incentive · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Public good · Sociology · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

• The Civic Minimum

  Stuart White•The civic minimum•2003

  Incluir item

• A Theory of Justice

  John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  Incluir item

• Patterns of Moral Complexity

  Open Access•Charles Larmore, Charles E Larmore•Patterns of Moral Complexity•1987

  Incluir item

• Beyond Neutrality

  Open Access•George Sher•Beyond Neutrality•1997

  Incluir item

• Liberal Neutrality

  Open Access•Alan Patten•Journal of Political Philosophy•2011

  Incluir item

• Are There Any Natural Rights

  H L A Hart•The Philosophical Review•1955

  Incluir item

• The Rejection of Consequentialism

  Samuel Scheffler•Rejection of Consequentialism•1984

  Incluir item