Love and unselfing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10691011 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katie H C Wong (0000-0003-1736-7346, University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqae089 |
| OpenAlex | W4400678879 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
This paper examines an overlooked aspect of interpersonal love: Like morality, love demands a certain kind of impartial or disinterested vision from us. We cannot love another person well, I argue, without being capable of such impartiality. Unfortunately, our self-interested nature makes meeting love's demand for impartiality extremely difficult if not impossible. This paper unpacks and offers a solution to this difficulty. Drawing on Iris Murdoch's work on love, I suggest that we can come to appreciate our beloveds as we should through unselfing, a state of self-forgetful, disinterested appreciation of an object outside the self. When we unself, we are so deeply moved by an external object's value—e.g. a stunning sunset—that all our subjective cares and concerns disappear from view. In concluding, I suggest that the capacity for impartiality we must develop to love someone well is relevant to understanding what our moral relations demand of us
Political science · Sociology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media Influence and Health · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology
Critique of the Power of Judgment
The nature of awe
Love as a Moral Emotion
The Sources of Normativity
Love and the Value of a Life
Beyond Words
Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement
Loving Someone in Particular
Friendship and Moral Danger
The Rejection of Consequentialism
Against Beneficence
Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion
Partiality, Favouritism and Morality
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |