Aristotle's Politics
Living Well and Living Together
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10691647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fred D Miller (University of Arizona, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 254 |
| Pages | 195-198 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqt029 |
| OpenAlex | W2323245472 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
This is the final instalment of a trilogy by Eugene Garver published by the University of Chicago Press. The preceding volumes were Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character (1994) and Confronting Aristotle's Ethics: Ancient and Modern Morality (2006). In this one, Garver discusses the thesis that ‘man is a political animal’ in terms of two closely related themes: living well and living together. He contends that Aristotle's politics differs in important ways from his ethics, especially in that ‘philosophy. ...plays a different role in understanding how to live well together than it does in an individual's understanding of how to live well—not only, I will argue, a different role but a greater role’ (p. 1). The book's six chapters concern the different parts of the Politics. Chapter 1 presents Politics I as posing the ‘practical problem of politics’, i.e. how to form a community that aims at a common good out of people capable of aiming at despotism instead. Chapter 2 presents Politics II as addressing Aristotle's ‘central question for the ideal state’, i.e. ‘What do people need to have in common in order to live together in a political community?’ Chapter 3 addresses a puzzle in Politics III, viz why doesn't the knowledge of the best life lead directly to a single best form of politics? The answer, he maintains, is that the statesman is never in a position to avail himself of the political philosopher's knowledge of the best life. Chapter 4 represents Politics IV as showing the statesman ‘how to construct a constitution and a way of life ethically superior to the citizens who comprise the state’ (p. 3). Chapter 5 finds in Politics V the thesis that in dealing with factions the statesman alone is able to improve common life and he does so by aiming at stability. Chapter 6 identifies as the point of Politics VII and VIII not as to depict a completely just constitution but instead to illustrate practical political reasoning about how a polis can realize the good life.
Aesthetics · Art · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ideal (ethics) · Literature · Morality · Order (exchange) · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · State (computer science) · Theology · Trilogy · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Aristóteles Y La Nueva Ciencia Política De Alexis De Tocqueville
Plato’s Political Philosophy and its Assessment in the Discourse of Modern Political Science
Aquinas on Kinship and Caritas
The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Politics
The rule of reason
The political character of Aristotle's ethics
Deliberating and acting together
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,54 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2023 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |