Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rights, Restitution, and Risk

Essays in Moral Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID10693233
AuthorsHolly M Smith (0000-0003-0866-1383), Judith Jarvis Thomson, William A Parent, William Parent
Year1989
Volume98
Issue3
Pages414
Publication date1989-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2185034
OpenAlexW1986918788
LanguageEN
Citations received35

Editor's Preface 1. A Defense of Abortion 2. Rights and Deaths 3. Self-Defense and Rights 4. Some Ruminations on Rights 5. Rights and Compensation 6. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem 7. The Trolley Problem 8. The Right to Privacy 9. Preferential Hiring 10. Some Questions about Government Regulation of Behavior 11. Imposing Risks 12. Remarks on Causation and Liability 13. Liability and Individualized Evidence Afterword Sources Index

Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · General interest · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Moral rights · Political science · Restitution · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Moral injury and the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•F Akram•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2021

  • Social class and moral judgment

    Open Access•Andreas Tutić, Friederike Haiser et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2024

  • Should More Be Saved? Diversity in Utilitarian Moral Judgment

    Corinna Michelin, Sandra Pellizzoni et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2010

  • Lockdowns and the ethics of intergenerational compensation

    Open Access•Kalewold Hailu Kalewold•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2023

  • On what 'ought' to be

    John Edwards•New Community•1997

  • Just War Theory

    Seth Lazar•Annual Review of Political Science•2017

  • Experience of agency and sense of responsibility

    Open Access•Giovanna Moretto, Eamonn Walsh et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2011

  • Traditional Stories as Possible Vignettes in the Research of Moral Judgement

    Open Access•Swagata Choudhuri, Jayanti Basu•Psychology and Developing Societies•2019

  • Confronting risks

    Steve Vanderheiden•Environmental Politics•2011

  • Objective or Subjective ‘Ought’

    Open Access•Sven Ove Hansson•Utilitas•2010

  • Discerning Subordination and Inviolability

    Open Access•Henry S Richardson•Utilitas•2008

  • Duty and Liability

    Open Access•Victor Tadros•Utilitas•2012

  • A New Set of Moral Dilemmas

    Open Access•Lorella Lotto, Andrea Manfrinati et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2013

  • On philosophical idling

    Open Access•Avner Baz•Synthese•2023

  • Artificial intelligence and moral dilemmas

    Open Access•Zaixuan Zhang, Zhansheng Chen et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Feeling socially connected increases utilitarian choices in moral dilemmas

    Brian J Lucas, Robert W Livingston•Journal of Experimental Social…•2014

  • The Relation of Language Context and Religiosity to Trilemma Judgments

    Open Access•Elyas Barabadi, Mohsen Rahmani Tabar et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2021

  • The neural basis of human moral cognition

    Open Access•Jorge Moll, Roland Zahn et al.•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2005

  • The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Neuron•2004

  • How (and where) does moral judgment work?

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua Greene et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2002

  • Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Piercarlo Valdesolo, David Desteno•Psychological Science•2006

  • Chapter 10 Motivated Moral Reasoning

    Peter H Ditto, David A Pizarro et al.•Moral judgment and decision making•2009

  • Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2008

  • Resources for Research on Analogy

    Open Access•Marcello Guarini, Amy T Butchart et al.•Informal Logic•2009

  • “We are all Different”

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen•The Journal of Ethics•2011

  • Repairing Historical Wrongs and the End of Empire

    Open Access•Daniel Butt•Social & Legal Studies•2012

  • An Ethical Framework for Hacking Operations

    Open Access•Ross W Bellaby•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • Should market harms be an exception to the Harm Principle

    Open Access•Richard Endörfer•Economics and Philosophy•2022

  • Just probabilities

    Open Access•Chad Lee-Stronach, Chad Lee‐Stronach•Noûs•2024

  • A unificationist approach to wrongful pure risking

    Open Access•Kritika Maheshwari•Inquiry•2024

  • Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem

    Caleb Perl•Ethics•2021

  • Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism

    Caleb Perl•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • An Eastern Look at a Western Dilemma

    Open Access•Xinyi Xu, Dries H Bostyn et al.•Social Psychological and…•2025

  • Clarifying Gender Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments

    Open Access•Joel Armstrong, Rebecca Friesdorf et al.•Social Psychological and…•2019

  • Ought” Implies “Can” but Does Not Imply “Must”

    Peter B M Vranas•The Philosophical Review•2018

Unique citing works35
Citations per year1,21
Citation span1997 - 2025 (29)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae