In Defense of Radical Empiricism
Essays and Lectures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10694243 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan E Adler (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 453-456 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00318108-109-3-453 |
| OpenAlex | W2048106900 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Book Review| July 01 2000 In Defense of Radical Empiricism: Essays and Lectures IN DEFENSE OF RADICAL EMPIRICISM: ESSAYS AND LECTURES. By Roderick Firth. Edited by John Troyer. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. Pp. vii, 439. Jonathan E. Adler Jonathan E. Adler Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (3): 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-453 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Jonathan E. Adler; In Defense of Radical Empiricism: Essays and Lectures. The Philosophical Review 1 July 2000; 109 (3): 453–456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-453 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsThe Philosophical Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Cornell University2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content
Art history · Citation · Download · Empiricism · Epistemology · Icon · Library science · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |