Compatibilists Could Have Done Otherwise
Responsibility and Negative Agency
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10695699 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alison Mcintyre (0000-0002-2551-4791, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1994 |
| Volumen | 103 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 453 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1994-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Philosophical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470 |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2185789 |
| OpenAlex | W2314761286 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
One is morally responsible for what one has done only if one could have done otherwise. Those who believe that moral responsibility is incompatible with causal determinism often invoke this principle, known as the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, to show that their position has a foothold in ordinary ways of thinking about the conditions of moral responsibility.' The incompatibilist assumes that whether an agent could have done otherwise in some situation depends on whether that agent could have acted differently in circumstances exactly the same as those that actually existed, and so infers that if determinism is true, this condition of moral responsibility is never satisfied. Interpreted in this way, the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (henceforth PAP) states a metaphysical rather than a psychological condition of responsibility; one cannot ascertain whether it is satisfied by examining the agent's views, attitudes, and assumptions. Nevertheless, incompatibilists often support this principle by arguing that it is presupposed in our ordinary conception of ourselves as deliberators and agents.2 If determinism is true, then an important element in our self-conception as agents is simply a delusion, according to the incompatibilist, and the practice of holding people responsible for their actions that rests upon it is ungrounded-or at least not as well grounded as we ordinarily suppose
Agency (philosophy) · Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · General interest · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification
Keeping It Simple
Omissions, Moral Luck, and Minding the (Epistemic) Gap
An ability-based theory of responsibility for collective omissions
Why there are no Frankfurt‐style omission cases
Ceteris Paribus, I Could Have Done Otherwise
Omissions, Responsibility, and Symmetry
Omissões
Moral Responsibility and Omissions
The Frankfurt Cases and Responsibility for Omissions
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,45 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |