Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deliberation as Inquiry

Aristotle's Alternative to the Presumption of Open Alternatives

Bibliographic Data

ID10695923
AuthorsKaren Margrethe Nielsen (corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume120
Issue3
Pages383-421
Publication date2011-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/00318108-1263683
OpenAlexW2119660184
LanguageEN
Citations received17

This article examines Aristotle's model of deliberation as inquiry (zêtêsis), arguing that Aristotle does not treat the presumption of open alternatives as a precondition for rational deliberation. Deliberation aims to uncover acts that are up to us and conducive to our ends; it essentially consists in causal mapping. Unlike the comparative model presupposed in the literature on deliberation, Aristotle's model can account for the virtuous agent's deliberation, as well as deliberation with a view to “satisficing” desires and deliberation that fails to uncover any expedient course of action. Aristotle's account of the constraints governing rational deliberation is furthermore not incompatibilist—for all Aristotle says, we may deliberate rationally despite being committed to the truth of determinism

Action (physics) · Deliberation · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Presumption · Satisficing · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy

  • Phronesis and the Virtues ( NE vi 12–13)

    Open Access•Daniel C Russell•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Beginning and Ending with Eudaimonia

    Open Access•C D C Reeve, Charles Reeve•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Competing Ways of Life and Ring Composition ( NE x 6–8)

    Open Access•Thornton Lockwood•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Protreptic Aspects of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics

    Open Access•D S Hutchinson, Dana Hutchinson et al.•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Aristotle’s Analysis of Akratic Action

    Open Access•Hendrik Lorenz•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Was Aristotle a Humean? A Partisan Guide to the Debate

    Open Access•Jessica Moss•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • The Relationship between Aristotle’s Ethical and Political Discourses ( NE x 9)

    Open Access•Rachana Kamtekar•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • The Eudemian Ethics and Its Controversial Relationship to the Nicomachean Ethics

    Open Access•Lawrence J Jost, Lawrence Jost•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Aristotle on Women

    Open Access•Sophia M Connell•Aristotle on Women•2021

  • Philosophical Virtue

    Open Access•Kristen Inglis•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Happiness and the External Goods

    Open Access•Timothy D Roche•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • Why Is Aristotle’s Virtue of Character a Mean? Taking Aristotle at His Word ( NE ii 6)

    Open Access•Lesley Brown•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    Open Access•Susanne Bobzien, C D C Reeve et al.•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

  • The Constitution of the Soul

    Open Access•Karen Margrethe Nielsen•The Classical Quarterly•2015

  • Sceptical Deliberations

    Open Access•Simon-Pierre Chevarie-Cossette, Simon‐Pierre Chevarie‐Cossette•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2020

  • Deliberation in Ancient Greek Assemblies

    Daniela Cammack•Classical Philology•2020

  • Aristotle on Reasoning and Rational Animals

    Ian C McCready-Flora•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2023

Citations per year1.42
Citation span2014 - 2023 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae