The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10697414 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timm Triplett (0000-0002-3538-3211, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 450-453 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00318108-109-3-450 |
| OpenAlex | W1985907834 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Book Review| July 01 2000 The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm THE PHILOSOPHY OF RODERICK M. CHISHOLM. Edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn. The Library of Living Philosophers, vol. 25. Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997. Pp. xviii, 738. Timm Triplett Timm Triplett Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (3): 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-450 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Timm Triplett; The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. The Philosophical Review 1 July 2000; 109 (3): 450–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-450 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsThe Philosophical Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Cornell University2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content
Art · Citation · Download · Icon · Information retrieval · Literature · Publishing · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2007 - 2012 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |