Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A “Revolutionary” Philosophy of Science

Feyerabend and The Degeneration of Critical Rationalism Into Sceptical Fallibilism

Bibliographic Data

ID10703162
AuthorsJohn G Mcevoy (University of Cincinnati, corresponding author)
Year1975
Volume42
Issue1
Pages49-66
Publication date1975-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/288620
OpenAlexW1964342433
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited9

The works of Paul K. Feyerabend, Norwood Russell Hanson and Thomas S. Kuhn have come to occupy a central place in the annals of contemporary philosophy of science. Some of their contemporaries, ([1], [14], [20]), tend to regard them as the vanguard of a new “revolutionary” intellectual movement. Reacting against the views of their positivist predecessors, they embrace and propagate the idea that “pervasive presuppositions” are fundamental to scientific investigations. Thus, Feyerabend thinks that, “... scientific theories are ways of looking at the world; and their adoption affects our general beliefs and expectations, and thereby also our experiences and our conception of reality” ([5], p. 29). This is in stark contrast to the positivist view that the aim of science is the systematization of experience that exists independently of any scientific theories ([12], p. 178). This new view of scientific theories also involves a “radical” conception of the nature of theoretical change. Rejecting the positivist notion of any constant element (experience, observation language, etc.) through such change, Kuhn regards a basic theoretical change as a conceptual revolution and “wants to say that after a revolution scientists are responding to a different world” ([14], p. 110). Hanson uses the phrase ‘theory-loaded’ to give expression to a view of the semantic content of observation statements that follows from this general position ([11], pp. 19 ff.)

Epistemology · Logical positivism · Philosophy of science · Positivism · Pragmatism · Rationalism · Scientific revolution · Scientific theory · Skepticism · Sociology · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History

  • Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa

    Randy J Tanner, Randy Tanner et al.•International Journal of Sociology•2010

  • Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Matteo Collodel•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • A tale of three theories

    Open Access•Luca Tambolo•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Towards an Empirically Adequate Theory of Science

    Open Access•Janet A Kourany•Philosophy of Science•1982

  • Anthropology As Empirical Science

    Open Access•J Tim O''Meara, J Tim O’meara et al.•American Anthropologist•1989

  • Concepts of Science

    Peter Achinstein•Concepts of Science•1971

  • Consolations for the Specialist

    Open Access•Paul K Feyerabend•Criticism and the Growth of…•1970

  • Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

    Open Access•I LAKATOS, И Лакатос•Criticism and the Growth of…•1970

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • Aspects of Scientific Explanation

    Carl Gustav Hempel•Aspects of Scientific Explanation•1970

  • How not to talk about meaning

    Hilary Putnam•Philosophical Papers•2010

  • Feyerabend and Galileo

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1973

Citations per year0.11
Citation span1982 - 2016 (35)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae