Vagueness and Logic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10704000 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carl G Hempel (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1939 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 163-180 |
| Publication date | 1939-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/286543 |
| OpenAlex | W2012540929 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 3 |
As is rather generally admitted today, the terms of our language in scientific as well as in everyday use, are not completely precise, but exhibit a more or less high degree of vagueness. It is the purpose of this paper to examine the consequences of this circumstance for a series of questions which belong to the field of logic. First of all, the meaning and the logical status of the concept of vagueness will be analyzed; then we will try to find out whether logical terms are free from vagueness, and whether vagueness has an influence upon the validity of the customary principles of logic; finally, the possibilities of diminishing the vagueness of scientific concepts by suitable logical devices will be briefly dealt with
Epistemology · Fuzzy logic · Logical conjunction · Meaning (existential) · Vagueness · Artificial Intelligence · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
Integrale Akteurtheorie – zur Modellierung eines Bezugsrahmens für komplexe Akteure / Integral Actor Theory – Modeling a Frame of Reference for Complex Actors
Vagueness And The Sorites Paradox
What Is the Value of Vagueness
Zum bivalenten Denken bei Max Weber, Niklas Luhmann und Hartmut Esser
Vagueness in vogue
Generalization of complementarity
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.12 |
| Citation span | 1974 - 2021 (48) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |