Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Objectivity in the Social Sciences

Bibliographic Data

ID10704405
AuthorsEleanor Bisbee (Amerikan Hastanesi, corresponding author)
Year1937
Volume4
Issue3
Pages371-382
Publication date1937-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/286468
OpenAlexW2012771497
LanguageEN
Citations received1

To be scientific is to be objective. This is a sine qua non in the social scientists’ efforts to keep their researches on a par with those of the natural scientists. The extreme differences of subject matter in the two fields, however, make it difficult to maintain an even standard of objectivity. Whether objectivity is defined in the strict Cartesian sense or in a broader sense also makes a difference. The Cartesian meaning threatens to enslave the social sciences to Physics as the Lord of All Sciences, and this possibility is so familiar that it needs but brief comment. A broader interpretation of objectivity meets with complications which are only inadequately recognized as yet, and which may call for reinterpretation of the scope of science or else may open up new and independent avenues of opportunity beyond the limitations of science

Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy) · Reinterpretation · Sine qua non · Sociology · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Critical tourism scholars

    Tomas Pernecky•Tourism Geographies•2020

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae