Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Explanatory Stabilization in Situations of Evidential Uncertainty

Bibliographic Data

ID10705161
AuthorsSamuel Schindler (0000-0002-5656-9840, Aarhus University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume92
Issue1
Pages204-222
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/psa.2024.26
OpenAlexW4404084365
LanguageEN
References cited53

In this article I issue a challenge to what I call the Independence Thesis of Theory Assessment (ITTA). According to ITTA, the evidence for (or against) a theory must be assessed independently from the theory explaining the evidence. I argue that ITTA is undermined by cases of evidential uncertainty, in which scientists have been guided by the explanatory power of their theories in the assessment of the evidence. Instead, I argue, these cases speak in favor of a model of theory assessment in which explanatory power may indeed contribute to the stabilization of the evidential basis

Decision theory · Economics · Epistemology · Explanatory power · Independence (probability theory) · Positive economics · Statistics · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Theoretical Virtues in Science

    Samuel Schindler•Theoretical Virtues in Science•2018

  • Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge

    Deborah G Mayo•Error and the Growth of…•1996

  • Laws and Symmetry

    Bas C Van Fraassen•Laws and Symmetry•1989

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • I.—studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I.)

    Carl G Hempel•Mind•1945

  • Putting explanation back into “inference to the best explanation”

    Open Access•Marc Lange•Noûs•2022

  • What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology

    Open Access•Stanley B Klein•Theory & Psychology•2014

  • Selectivity And Discord

    Allan Franklin•Selectivity and Discord•2002

  • Hume's Problem

    Colin Howson•Hume's Problem•2000

  • The Essential Tension

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn•The Essential Tension•1977

  • On the pragmatic and epistemic virtues of inference to the best explanation

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•Synthese•2021

  • Locating IBE in the Bayesian framework

    Open Access•Jonathan Weisberg•Synthese•2009

  • Van Fraassen's critique of inference to the best explanation

    Open Access•Samir Okasha•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2000

  • Novelty, coherence, and Mendeleev’s periodic table

    Samuel Schindler•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Douglas on values

    Kevin C Elliott•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Theory-laden experimentation

    Open Access•Samuel Schindler•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk

    Open Access•David Steel, Daniel Steel•Philosophy of Science•2010

  • How Explanatory Reasoning Justifies Pursuit

    Open Access•Rune Nyrup•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems)

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori•Philosophy of Science•2012

  • On a Bayesian Analysis of the Virtue of Unification

    Open Access•Jonah N Schupbach, David H Gla•Philosophy of Science•2005

  • Against Probabilistic Measures of Explanatory Quality

    Open Access•Marc Lange•Philosophy of Science•2022

  • The Logic of Explanatory Power

    Open Access•Jonah N Schupbach, David H Gla et al.•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification

    Open Access•Wayne C Myrvold•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • The Inference to the Best Explanation

    Gilbert H Harman, Gilbert Harman•The Philosophical Review•1965

  • Because without Cause

    Mark Povich, Carl F Craver•The Philosophical Review•2018

  • The Crux of Crucial Experiments

    Marcel Weber•The British Journal for the…•2009

  • The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses

    Michael Strevens•The British Journal for the…•2001

  • Bayesianism and Inference to the Best Explanation

    Leah Henderson•The British Journal for the…•2014

  • Confirmation, Heuristics, and Explanatory Reasoning

    Timothy Mcgrew•The British Journal for the…•2003

  • How to Learn from Theory-Dependent Evidence; or Commutativity and Holism

    J Dmitri Gallow•The British Journal for the…•2014

  • How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions

    Malcolm Forster, Elliott Sober•The British Journal for the…•1994

  • Model, Theory, and Evidence in the Discovery of the DNA Structure

    Samuel Schindler•The British Journal for the…•2008

  • Commutativity or Holism? A Dilemma for Conditionalizers

    Jonathan Weisberg•The British Journal for the…•2009

  • When a Crisis Becomes an Opportunity

    Jane Suilin Lavelle•The British Journal for the…•2022

  • Probability and the Explanatory Virtues

    Clark Glymour•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic

    Michael Huemer•The British Journal for the…•2009

  • A problem in theory

    Open Access•Michael Muthukrishna, J Henrich•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • The Reception of Mendeleev's Periodic Law in America and Britain

    Stephen G Brush•Isis•1996

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae