Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10705271 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David J Stump (0000-0002-0290-7533, University of San Francisco, autor de correspondencia), David Stump |
| Año | 1992 |
| Volumen | 59 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 456-460 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1992-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/289681 |
| OpenAlex | W1979450087 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
Naturalism implies unity of method—an application of the methods of science to the methodology of science itself and to value theory. Epistemological naturalists have tried to find a privileged discipline to be the methodological model of philosophy of science and epistemology. However, since science itself is not unitary, the use of one science as a model amounts to a reduction and distorts the philosophy of science just as badly as traditional philosophy of science distorted science, despite the fact that the central theme of naturalized philosophy of science is that methodology should be true to science as practiced. I argue that naturalized philosophy of science must apply a plurality of methods to epistemological issues
Economic methodology · Epistemology · Naturalism · Philosophy of computer science · Philosophy of science · Political science · Sociology · Theme (computing) · Unitary state · Value (mathematics) · Western philosophy · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2023 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |