Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Science, Values, and the Value of Science

Bibliographic Data

ID10705494
AuthorsNoretta Koertge (Indiana University, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume67
IssueS3
PagesS45-S57
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/392808
OpenAlexW2079482220
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited23

Protagonists in the so-called Science Wars differ most markedly in their views about the role of values in science and what makes science valuable. Scientists and philosophers of science have traditionally considered the principal aims of science to be explanation and application. Only cognitive values should influence what is taken to be explanatory. Social and political values affect the priority assigned to various scientific problems and the ways in which scientific results are applied. Ethical considerations may be brought to bear on the treatment of human and animal subjects, and the manner in which scientific results are communicated. Recent critiques of science allege that the content of scientific explanations reflects the dominant ideology and interests of scientists and their patrons. Instead of calling for more value neutrality, some now urge that science take as a principal aim the emancipation of oppressed subcultures. Not only should progressive political values be allowed to set the problems attempted, they also should be used to constrain the types of answers which are pursued. Since scientific knowledge is constructed by us, we should take responsibility for its content. This paper argues that the project of Emancipationist science is impractical and self-defeating. There is good reason to believe that there would be unresolvable political disputes concerning which kinds of scientific theories are truly emancipiatory. Furthermore, just as placebos cease to work when recognized as such, so would a science known to be constrained by political considerations lose its special epistemic authority

Epistemology · Ideology · Neutrality · Philosophy of science · Political science · Politics · Principal (computer security) · Scientific evidence · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Evolution and Science Education · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies

  • Models of science and society

    Open Access•Markus Dressel•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

  • The Value-Free Ideal of Science

    Open Access•Jacopo Ambrosj, Kris Dierickx et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

  • What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like

    Open Access•Mike Carrier•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2022

  • Beyond Values

    Open Access•Mason Majszak•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Feminist Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Anke Bueter•Feminist Philosophy of Science•2024

  • How Might We Put Gender Politics into Science

    Open Access•Noretta Koertge•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • The value-free ideal in codes of conduct for research integrity

    Open Access•Jacopo Ambrosj, Hugh Desmond et al.•Synthese•2023

  • How to conceive of science for the benefit of society

    Open Access•Mike Carrier•Synthese•2021

  • State of the field

    Open Access•Justin Biddle•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Scientific knowledge

    Barry Barnes•Scientific knowledge•1996

  • The myth of the framework

    Karl Popper, M A Notturno•The myth of the framework•1984

  • Higher superstition

    Paul R Gross•Higher superstition•1994

  • Science as a Process

    David L Hull•Science As a Process•1988

  • The Five Sexes

    Open Access•A Fausto-Sterling, Anne Fausto‐sterling•The Sciences•1993

  • Science as Social Knowledge

    Helen E Longino•Science As Social Knowledge•2020

  • The Myth of the Framework

    Karl Popper•Rational Changes in Science•1976

  • A House Built on Sand

    Noretta Koertge•A house built on sand•1998

  • The Essential Tension

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn•The Essential Tension•1977

  • Feminist Epistemology

    Open Access•Elizabeth Anderson•Hypatia•1995

  • Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge

    Michael Lynch, Fuller et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1994

  • Fuller's Civic Republicanism and the Question of Scientific Expertise

    Open Access•Brian S Baigrie•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•1995

  • Transgressing the Boundaries

    Alan D Sokal•Social Text•1996

  • The Advancement of Science

    Philip Kitcher•The Advancement of Science•1995

  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump

    Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer•Leviathan and the Air-Pump•2011

  • Sociology of Science

    Joseph Ben-David, Joseph Ben‐david et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1975

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,41
Citation span2004 - 2025 (22)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae