Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Epr, Bell, and Collapse

A Route Around “Stochastic” Hidden Variables

Bibliographic Data

ID10706177
AuthorsGeoffrey Hellman (0000-0001-5559-4932, Twin Cities Orthopedics, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume54
Issue4
Pages558-576
Publication date1987-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/289405
OpenAlexW2029347740
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited22

Two EPR arguments are reviewed, for their own sake, and for the purpose of clarifying the status of “stochastic“ hidden variables. The first is a streamlined version of the EPR argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics. The role of an anti-instrumentalist (“realist”) interpretation of certain probability statements is emphasized. The second traces out one horn of a central foundational dilemma, the collapse dilemma; complex modal reasoning, similar to the original EPR, is used to derive determinateness (of all spin components of two spin-1⁄2 particles in the singlet state) from just (a form of) weak locality, result definiteness, and an assumption on propensities based on conservation. Theories meeting these conditions are therefore constrained by the Bell inequalities. Neither controversial assumptions of “strong locality” (“factorability”) nor of determinism are employed in the derivation. The categories of “stochastic hidden variables” are then analyzed; one can focus on “quasi-definite” theories, without loss of generality. A means of excluding these is proposed, based on a demand that certain ideal cases be accurately treated. Theorems from quantum measurement theory, sometimes cited as showing that such cases are not physically possible, are found inapplicable

Argument (complex analysis) · Determinism · Dilemma · Epistemology · EPR paradox · Generality · Hidden variable theory · Interpretation (philosophy) · Interpretations of quantum mechanics · Locality · Mathematical economics · Physics · Principle of locality · Quantum · Quantum entanglement · Quantum mechanics · Quantum nonlocality · Quantum process · Randomness · Statistics · Theoretical physics · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications

  • For whom the Bell arguments toll

    Open Access•James Hawthorne, Michael Silberstein•Synthese•1995

  • Outcome predictions and property attribution

    Open Access•GianCarlo Ghirardi, Renata Grassi•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1994

  • Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds—A Stapp in the Wrong Direction

    Robert K Clifton, Jeremy Butterfield et al.•The British Journal for the…•1990

  • Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers

    Open Access•Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard et al.•Physical Review Letters•1982

  • Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

    Open Access•Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky et al.•Physical Review D•1935

  • A Theory of Conditionals

    Robert Stalnaker, Robert C Stalnaker•Ifs•1968

  • On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

    Open Access•J Stephen Bell•Physics Physique Fizika•1964

  • Stochastic Einstein-locality and the Bell theorems

    Open Access•Geoffrey Hellman•Synthese•1982

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.08
Citation span1990 - 1995 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae