Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kinds and Criteria of Scientific Laws

Bibliographic Data

ID10706240
AuthorsMario Bunge (Universidad de Buenos Aires, corresponding author)
Year1961
Volume28
Issue3
Pages260-281
Publication date1961-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/287809
OpenAlexW2001498194
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Factual statements that might qualify for the status of law statements are classed from various philosophically relevant standpoints (referents, precision, structure of predicates, extension, systemicity, inferential power, inception, ostensiveness, testability, levels, and determination categories). More than seven dozen of not mutually exclusive kinds of lawlike statements emerge. Strictly universal and counterfactually powerful statements are seen to constitute just one kind of lawlike statements; classificatory and some statistical laws, e.g., are shown not to comply with the requirements of universality and counterfactual force. Conditions for lawlike statements to be called laws are then examined, and a liberal criterion of lawfulness is finally proposed, which reads thus: A proposition is a law statement if and only if it is a posteriori (not logically true), general in some respect (does not refer to unique objects), has been satisfactorily corroborated for the time being in some domain, and belongs to a theory (whether adult or embryonic). It is claimed that criteria of laws change alongside with the emergence of new usages of the term ‘law’, and that by adopting a liberal criterion of lawfulness we would conform to contemporary usage and would cease inhibiting the search for regularities in the sciences of man

Counterfactual thinking · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic) · Political science · Proposition · Scientific law · Statement (logic) · Term (time) · Testability · Universality (dynamical systems) · Computer Science · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Explanation Theory and Models of Migration

    Stephen Gale•Economic Geography•1973

  • Some Recent Work on the Problem of Law

    Open Access•Evan K Jobe•Philosophy of Science•1967

  • The Place of Induction in Science

    Open Access•Mario Bunge•Philosophy of Science•1960

  • Studies in the Logic of Explanation

    Open Access•Carl G Hempel, Paul Oppenheim•Philosophy of Science•1948

  • Testability and Meaning

    Open Access•Rudolf Carnap•Philosophy of Science•1936

  • Existential Hypotheses

    Open Access•Herbert Feigl•Philosophy of Science•1950

  • Foundations of Inference in Natural Science

    William Kneale, John Oulton Wisdom et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1953

  • Probability and Induction

    D R Cousin, William Kneale•The Philosophical Quarterly•1951

  • Probability and Induction

    Donald C Williams, William Kneale•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1950

  • Fact, fiction, and forecast

    Nelson Goodman•Fact, fiction, and forecast•1983

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1967 - 1973 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae