Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Predictive Inference

Bibliographic Data

ID10708191
AuthorsWesley C Salmon (John Brown University, corresponding author)
Year1957
Volume24
Issue2
Pages180-190
Publication date1957-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/287532
OpenAlexW1976652383
LanguageEN
Citations received2

A common type of inductive problem is to predict the nature of an unobserved finite sample of a given population on the basis of an observed finite sample of the same population. More precisely, given a class of events A , we examine a sample S n having n members, of which m i belong to the class B i . On the basis of our knowledge that m i / n of S n have been B i , we attempt to predict the ratio of members of B i to members of A in a sample S r containing r unobserved members of A. This type of inference has been called “predictive inference” by Carnap. It is not necessary to argue that all inductive problems reduce to this form; we merely observe that such problems frequently arise, and that they have practical and theoretical importance. In The Short Run I suggested that this kind of problem could be handled by first determining the long run probability P ( A, B i ) of B i , relative to A (presumably on the basis of the relative frequency F n ( A, B i ) of B i , to A in the observed sample S n ) and then predicting that the relative frequency of B i within the unobserved sample S r (the short run) will approximate P ( A, B i ) sufficiently for practical purposes. The foregoing procedure requires a rule of each of two types: a rule for the ascertainment of the values of long run probabilities, and a rule for the application of knowledge of long run probabilities to predictions in the short run. The Short Run was not concerned with the nature and justification of rules of the first type, but rather sought to justify a rule of the second type on the assumption that we already possess knowledge of long run probabilities

Basis (linear algebra) · Class (philosophy) · Econometrics · Inductive reasoning · Inference · Physics · Population · Sample (material) · Statistics · Type (biology) · Artificial Intelligence · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Demography · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

  • On Vindicating Induction

    Open Access•Wesley C Salmon•Philosophy of Science•1963

  • The philosophy of Hans Reichenbach

    Open Access•Wesley C Salmon•Synthese•1977

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1963 - 1977 (15)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae