Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring Prose Difficulty Using the Rauding Scale

Bibliographic Data

ID10722240
AuthorsRonald P Carver (corresponding author)
Year1975
Volume11
Issue4
Pages660
Publication date1975-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueReading Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-0553 • E-ISSN: 1936-2722
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/747460
OpenAlexW1983381075
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited4

A NEW TECHNIQUE for estimating the difficulty of reading material has been developed and evaluated. The technique, called the Rauding Scale, involves the subjective ratings of qualified experts who use a set of anchor rating passages at grade levels 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 17. The reliability of the scale was high, r = .97; and the expected rating error is only about 1 grade. With respect to validity, this scale correlated higher with the actual grade levels of passages that were used in school than did cloze, Flesch, Dale-Chall, and 3 other readability formulas. Passages sampled from basal reading materials, newspapers, curriculum materials, and graduate school materials suggest that the scale provides valid grade level scores throughout the entire school range (grades 1 through 18). It was concluded that the Rauding Scale is more reliable and valid than other readability measurement techniques because it is more sensitive to the idea or concept difficulty of a passage

Cartography · Geography · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Scale (ratio) · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification

  • Measuring translation difficulty

    Sanjun Sun•Across Languages and Cultures•2015

  • Optimal Rate of Reading Prose

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1982

  • How Good Are Some of the World's Best Readers

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1985

  • La Lisibilité Computationnelle

    Thibaut François•ITL - International Journal of…•2010

  • A Response to Kibby's Criticisms of the Rauding Scale Research

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1975

  • Toward a Theory of Reading Comprehension and Rauding

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1977

  • Rauding Theory Predictions of Amount Comprehended under Different Purposes and Speed Reading Conditions

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1984

  • Another Look at Rauding Theory

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1977

  • The Effect of Practice through Repeated Reading on Gain in Reading Ability Using a Computer-Based Instructional System

    Ronald P Carver, James V Hoffman•Reading Research Quarterly•1981

  • The Effect of Reading Library Books at Different Levels of Difficulty upon Gain in Reading Ability

    Ronald P Carver, Robert E Leibert•Reading Research Quarterly•1995

  • Is Reading Rate Constant or Flexible

    Ronald P Carver•Reading Research Quarterly•1983

  • Using Readability Levels of Local Materials for the Investigation of a Contemporary Problem

    Charles K Curtis, James P Shaver•The Social Studies•1979

  • How Will Literacy Be Defined in the New Millennium

    Open Access•James W Cunningham, Joyce E Many et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2000

  • A new readability yardstick.

    Rudolph Flesch•Journal of Applied Psychology•1948

  • What Do Adults Read

    Amiel T Sharon•Reading Research Quarterly•1973

  • Readability

    John R Bormuth•Reading Research Quarterly•1966

  • Two dimensions of tests

    Ronald P Carver•American Psychologist•1974

Citations per year0.25
Citation span1975 - 2015 (41)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae