Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique

Bibliographic Data

ID10723950
AuthorsJorge Alexandre Harrison Arroz (World Vision Mozambique, Moçambique), Jorge Arroz (0000-0001-6604-4573, World Vision), Francisco Chirrute (World Vision Mozambique, Moçambique), Chandana Mendis (World Vision Mozambique, Moçambique), Marta Honesta Chande (World Vision Mozambique, Moçambique), Marta Chande (World Vision), Veronique Kollhoff (World Vision Mozambique, Moçambique)
Year2016
Volume50
Issue0
Pages67-67
Publication date2016-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006335
PMID28099655
OpenAlexW2566200943
SciELOS0034-89102016000100706
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

OBJECTIVE To assess the ownership and use of mosquito nets in 2014, in Mozambique. METHODS This observational and cross-sectional study assessed, in February and March 2015, 69 districts (nine of 11 provinces of Mozambique) that have benefited from the mass distribution of mosquito nets. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling methodology was used. Each locality was denominated supervision area. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling opts for a minimum of 19 households (in this case, we decided for a minimum of 100 households per district) from each supervision area to assess an indicator (in this case, two indicators were assessed: ownership and use of mosquito nets). Two questions guided the research: a) received a mosquito net; b) used a mosquito net the night before. RESULTS A total of 6,725 households were assessed. Eighty three percent of them had received mosquito nets in the campaign. Of the 6,232 respondents, 82.0% said they used mosquito nets the night before. The districts of the provinces with low coverage of ownership and use were Tete (69.5% and 60.0%, respectively), Zambezia (79.0% and 60.0%, respectively), and Gaza (81.6% and 70.7%, respectively). The largest coverage of ownership and use were observed in the districts of Nampula (96.7% and 93.8%, respectively) and Niassa (86.0% and 85.4% respectively). CONCLUSIONS In the districts assessed, the progression of ownership and use of mosquito nets is satisfactory. Nampula and Niassa are the only provinces where ownership and use are at desired levels

Distribution (mathematics) · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Mosquito net · Socioeconomics · Insect Pest Control Strategies · Insect Utilization and Effects · Mathematics · Medicine · Mosquito-borne diseases and control

  • Estimating malaria chemoprevention and vector control coverage using program and campaign data

    Open Access•Johanna Nice, Honelgn Nahusenay et al.•Journal of Global Health•2020

  • The persistent problem of malaria

    Open Access•Leeanne Stratton, Marie S O''Neill et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae