Kubrick’s audible bodies
Unseen subjectivities in 2001 and The Shining
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10737949 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Batcho (0000-0003-3536-1431, I-Shou University , Kaohsiung , Taiwan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 2021 |
| Issue | 243 |
| Pages | 281-303 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Semiotica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2020-0105 |
| OpenAlex | W3209766850 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Stanley Kubrick is regarded as a filmmaker of complex imagery. Yet the vitality of his more metaphysical works lies in what is unseen. There is an embodiment to Kubrick’s films that maintains a sense of subjectivity, but one which is unapparent and non-visual. This opens another way into Kubrick’s works, that of conditions of audibility (hearing/listening), affectivity, and signs. To think of embodiment from such an audible perspective requires one to subvert film spectatorship (the frame) and instead enter the reality of the film’s immanent, borderless unfolding as itself. This essay applies Gilles Deleuze’s semiotic concepts of cinema, metaphysics, and subjectivity to conditions of audibility and unseeing, a connection Deleuze largely ignored in his writings. These dual concepts of audibility and unseeing break prevailing analytical norms in cinema discourse that affirm limitations via material, visual, textual, and spatial reification: subjective-objective delineations, the body and the gaze, sound as necessarily spatial/material, and the dominance of images in regard to aesthetics, surveillance, and evidence. Instead, this essay moves through Kubrick’s constructions of milieu that are unseen in the midst of an otherwise visual unfolding, and audible in the midst of an otherwise sonic unfolding. To consider Kubrick’s films through their audible embodiment, one must detach (1) the microphone from its adherence to space, (2) the body from its visual gaze. Here, sounds, images, and objects become secondary to hearing and signs in a temporal unfolding, resulting in a cinema that is experiential rather than representational. This opens to an actuality of spirit within the world of the film, offering new opportunities for creativity in the cinematic form
Aesthetics · Art · Depiction · Epistemology · Gaze · Literature · Metaphysics · Movie theater · Psychoanalysis · Realism · Semiotics · Subjectivity · Cinema and Media Studies · Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
| Highly cited | No |
|---|