Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Regimes, Religious Dominance, and Economic Preferences

Insights from the World Values Survey and Global State of Democracy Indices

Bibliographic Data

ID10763003
AuthorsVivek Jadhav (0000-0002-5500-8101, Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad India, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume106
Issue1
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ssqu.13482
OpenAlexW4405681897
LanguageEN
References cited50

Objective This research explores how political regimes, individual incomes, and religious dominance influence societies' attitudes toward freedom, equality, and income inequality. This work applies an empirical framework on political regimes and socio‐religious contexts to study the impacts of political regimes and socioeconomic variables on individual beliefs about freedom, equality, and income inequality. Methods Utilizing data from the World Values Survey (WVS) along with the Global State of Democracy (GSoD) indices, the study employs a two‐stage regression model to control for issues of endogeneity. This approach helps to understand differences in preferences for freedom and equality under democratic, authoritarian, and hybrid regimes, along with the influence of income and religious dominance. Findings The results show that democratic regimes prioritize equality, especially among the poor and members of non‐dominant religious groups. Under authoritarian regimes, however, high‐income populations tend to favour freedom. Hybrid regimes exhibit varied tendencies, with both income status and religious dominance significantly influencing perceptions of equality. Conclusion This research contributes to understanding how political, economic, and religious factors shape societal preferences. The results provide insights into the complex interplay between governance, socioeconomic conditions, and individual preferences

Biology · Democracy · Development economics · Dominance (genetics) · Economics · Geography · Islam · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Religious values · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Statistics · Survey data collection · World Values Survey · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • A Theory of Political Transitions

    Daron Acemoglu, James A Robinson•American Economic Review•2001

  • Democracy and growth

    Open Access•Robert J Barros, Robert J Barro•Journal of Economic Growth•1996

  • Income and Democracy

    Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson et al.•American Economic Review•2008

  • Why Does Inequality Matter?

    T M Scanlon, Т М Scanlon et al.•Why Does Inequality Matter?•2017

  • Democracy and Development

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski, Michael E Alvarez et al.•Democracy and Development•2000

  • Causality and Feedback Between Institutional Measures and Economic Growth

    Open Access•Alice M L Chong, A Chong et al.•Economics and Politics•2000

  • Inequality and Institutions

    Alexandra Chong, Alberto Chong et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2007

  • Inoculation Reduces Misinformation

    Open Access•Frederico Batista Pereira, Natália S Bueno et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2023

  • Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth

    Open Access•François Bourguignon, Thierry Verdier•Journal of Development Economics•2000

  • Democracy as an equilibrium

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•Public Choice•2005

  • Curriculum and Ideology

    Davide Cantoni, Yuyu Chen et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2017

  • The Great Divide

    Open Access•Keith Darden, Keith A Darden et al.•World Politics•2006

  • Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship

    Open Access•Markus Bernhard, Michael Bernhard et al.•World Politics•2007

  • Democracy in Transition

    A Neundorf•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences

    Open Access•Cindy D Kam•Political Behavior•2005

  • Partisanship and Preference Formation

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix•Political Behavior•2016

  • The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, James N Druckman et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • The Legacies of 1989

    Open Access•Grzegorz Ekiert, Jan Kubik•Journal of democracy•2014

  • How elitism undermines the study of voter competence

    Arthur Lupia•Critical Review•2006

  • Communism's Shadow

    Grigore Pop-Eleches, Joshua A Tucker•Comparative Politics•2011

  • How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect Ordinary People

    Open Access•A Neundorf, Johannes Gerschewski et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • Protests and Voter Defections in Electoral Autocracies

    Open Access•Katerina Tertytchnaya•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Elias Dinas, Ksenia Northmore-Ball•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World

    Open Access•Rune Slothuus, Martin Bisgaard•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes

    William G Jacoby•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • People's opium? Religion and economic attitudes

    Open Access•Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza et al.•Journal of Monetary Economics•2003

  • Religion and Economic Growth across Countries

    Robert J Barros, Robert J Barro et al.•American Sociological Review•2003

  • Religion, self-regulation, and self-control

    Michael E Mccullough, Brian L B Willoughby•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • The Last Instance

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•European Journal of Sociology•2004

  • Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes

    Grigore Pop-Eleches, Joshua A Tucker•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Institutions

    Open Access•Douglass C North•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Some Social Requisites of Democracy

    Open Access•Seymour Martin Lipset•American Political Science Review•1959

  • Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate

    Open Access•John G Bullock•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The Impact of Religious Involvement on Migration

    Scott M Myers•Social Forces•2000

  • Prosocial Behavior and Religion

    Open Access•Saroglou, Vassilis Saroglou et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae