Opportunities for Making Ends Meet and Upward Mobility
Differences in Organizational Deprivation Across Urban and Suburban Poor Neighborhoods
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10763595 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alexandra K Murphy (0000-0002-5786-3072, Princeton University), D Wallace (0000-0001-6648-9986, Arizona State University) |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1164-1186 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00726.x |
| PMID | 21125760 |
| OpenAlex | W2097699722 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 34 |
| Referências citadas | 35 |
Objectives. Given the recent rise of poverty in U.S. suburbs, this study asks: What poor neighborhoods are most disadvantageous, those in the city or those in the suburbs? Building on recent urban sociological work demonstrating the importance of neighborhood organizations for the poor, we are concerned with one aspect of disadvantage—the lack of availability of organizational resources oriented toward the poor. By breaking down organizations into those that promote mobility versus those that help individuals meet their daily subsistence needs, we seek to explore potential variations in the type of disadvantage that may exist. Methods. We test whether poor urban or suburban neighborhoods are more likely to be organizationally deprived by breaking down organizations into three types: hardship organizations, educational organizations, and employment organizations. We use data from the 2000 U.S. County Business Patterns and the 2000 U.S. Census and test neighborhood deprivation using logistic regression models. Results. We find that suburban poor neighborhoods are more likely to be organizationally deprived than are urban poor neighborhoods, especially with respect to organizations that promote upward mobility. Interesting racial and ethnic composition factors shape this more general finding. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that if a poor individual is to live in a poor neighborhood, with respect to access to organizational resources, he or she would be better off living in the central city. Suburban residence engenders isolation from organizations that will help meet one's daily needs and even more so from those offering opportunities for mobility
Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Social mobility · Social science · Sociology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Severe Deprivation in America
Volatility and Change in Suburban Nonprofit Safety Nets
Poverty and Academic Achievement Across the Urban to Rural Landscape
Legal financial obligations in the United States
Formal and Informal Social Organization
Navigating Networks
Resisting Amnesia
Spatial Networks of Neighborhood Violence
Urban Neighborhood Characteristics and the Spatial Distribution of Home and Community-Based Service Organizations in Michigan Metropolitan Statistical Areas
The influence of incarceration and Re-entry on the availability of health care organizations in Arkansas
Breaking Down Social Capital
Food Deserts and a Southwest Community of Baltimore City
The Growth of Ethnic Organizations in the Context of Neighborhood Change
Where Inequality Takes Place
Ethnography, Neighborhood Effects, and the Rising Heterogeneity of Poor Neighborhoods across Cities
Participation in Context
Predictors of U.S. Food Insecurity Across Nonmetropolitan, Suburban, and Principal City Residence During the Great Recession
Restorative Revitalization in Inner-Ring Suburban Communities
Economic Inactivity, Not in Employment, Education or Training (Neet) and Scarring
Exploring the spatial distribution of community resources focusing on municipalities
Neighborhood isolation in Chicago
Trajectories of Deprivation
Stuck in the suburbs? Socio-spatial exclusion of migrants in Shanghai
What goes up must come down
Reframing Suburbs
The Great Risk Shift and Precarity in the U.S. Housing Market
The local context of energy assistance
Beyond Urban Displacement
The Spatial Articulation of Urban Political Cleavages
Spatial and Sociodemographic Vulnerability
Do Neighborhood Organizational Resources Impact Recidivism
Urbanicity Moderates Associations between Family Income and Adolescent Academic Achievement
Unequal Displacement
From the State to the Street
Bargaining for Brooklyn
Cracks in the Pavement
Dynamics of Organizational Populations
The Intrametropolitan Geography of Poverty and the Nonprofit Sector in Southern California
A typology of U.S. suburban places
Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Nonprofit Sector
A Study of Factors Influencing the Growth of Nonprofits in Social Services
The Nonprofit sector
Suburban Neighborhood Poverty in U.S. Metropolitan Areas in 2000
A Comparison of Ethnic Businesses in Suburbs and City
Community Development
Proximity to service providers and service utilization among welfare recipients
How Do Places Matter? The Geography of Opportunity, Self-efficacy and a Look Inside the Black Box of Residential Mobility
The Benefits and Costs of Residential Mobility Programmes for the Poor
Human Services as Complex Organizations
The Changing Spatial Concentration of Income and Poverty among Suburbs of Large US Metropolitan Areas
Are Poor Neighborhoods Resource Deprived? A Case Study of Childcare Centers in New York
Suburban Municipal Expenditures
Suburban Fiscal Disparities and the Location Decisions of Firms
The Distribution of Urban Voluntary Resources
Suburbs and Satellites
When Work Disappears
Why Organizational Ties Matter for Neighborhood Effects
Living with Crime
Neighborhood Institutions as Resource Brokers
Socioeconomic Attainments of Asian Americans
Black Neighbors, Higher Crime? The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime
Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility
| Obras citantes distintas | 34 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,43 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 29 |