Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two Senses of Autonomy

Bibliographic Data

ID10792396
AuthorsRichard Fallon (0000-0001-6722-4189, corresponding author), Richard H Fallon
Year1994
Volume46
Issue4
Pages875
Publication date1994-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStanford Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-9765 • E-ISSN: 1939-8581
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1229095
OpenAlexW2298904368
LanguageEN
Citations received8

A number of commentators have identified autonomy as a central value of the First Amendment. In this essay, Professor Fallon argues that the two leading conceptions of autonomy, positive and negative liberty, are overly simple and flawed. He argues that autonomy-based First Amendment theory should recognize two alternative conceptions: descriptive autonomy, which considers the impact of external causal factors on individual liberty, and ascriptive autonomy, which represents each person's sovereignty over her moral choices. Professor Fallon introduces a four-part framework to gauge the extent to which a person is descriptively autonomous. He notes that ascriptive autonomy is less analytically neat, but argues that the concept is also important to First Amendment jurisprudence because it reflects an aspect of human self-understanding that descriptive autonomy fails to capture. Professor Fallon then explores the moral and policy issues that arise from distinguishing descriptive from ascriptive autonomy, concluding that both notions of autonomy are fundamental to the First Amendment. He warns, however, that because descriptive and ascriptive autonomy often pull in opposite directions, autonomy-based arguments frequently complicate rather than simplify First Amendment debates

Autonomy · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Value (mathematics · Criminal Law and Evidence · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • On Difference and Equality

    Open Access•Cynthia V Ward•Legal Theory•1997

  • Equitable relief as a relay between juridical and biopower

    Open Access•Gordon Hull•Man and World•2017

  • Overblocking autonomy

    Open Access•Gordon Hull•Man and World•2009

  • Privacy, People, and Markets

    Open Access•Gordon Hull•Ethics & International Affairs•2019

  • Farmer autonomy and the farming self

    Open Access•Paul V Stock, Jérémie Forney•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • Autonomy

    Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein•University of Toronto Law Journal•2020

  • Foundations of Academic Freedom

    Open Access•Liviu Andreescu•Studies in Philosophy and Education•2009

  • Sexual Politics and Ascriptive Autonomy

    Open Access•Elizabeth Ben‐ishai, Elizabeth Ben-Ishai•Politics & Gender•2010

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0.28
Citation span1997 - 2020 (24)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae