Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Incentives in the Diffusion of Family Planning Innovations

Bibliographic Data

ID10795254
AuthorsEverett M Rogers (corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume2
Issue12
Pages241
Publication date1971-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1965079
PMID5164391
OpenAlexW1973004754
LanguageEN
Citations received14

The first large-scale incentive program in family planning began in 1956 in India and since then incentive programs have spread; today at least 9 countries pay family planning incentives. A review of the history of incentives reveals the following criteria of incentives by which incentives can be classified; adopter vs. diffuser individual vs. group positive vs. negative monetary vs. nonmonetary immediate vs. delayed graduated vs. nongraduated contraception vs. births-prevented incentives. Based on research and experience with incentive schemes some generalizations can be made: (1) adopter incentives and diffuser incentives increase the rate of adoption of an innovation; (2) adopter incentives lead to adoption by different individuals than would otherwise adopt; (3) adopter and diffuser incentives may increase the quantity of adoptions but the quality may be low leading to undesirable consequences. Further research is needed on the process of persuasion and innovation decision so that the right people can be approached. This could prevent the necessity for coercive measures to control population growth

Business · Demographic economics · Developing country · Diffusion · Economic growth · Economics · Incentive · Microeconomics · Physics · Global Maternal and Child Health

  • Offering bonuses for reduced fertility

    Open Access•Stephen Enke, Bryan D Hickman•Journal of Biosocial Science•1973

  • Compensatory payments and vasectomy acceptance in urban Sri Lanka

    Open Access•Victor de Silva, Shyam Thapa et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•1988

  • Incentives and Disincentives in the Indian Family Welfare Program

    Jay Satia, J K Satia et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1986

  • A Field-worker Incentive Experimental Study

    M C Chang, Ming‐Cheng Chang et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1972

  • China's experience on population control

    Open Access•Leo A Orleans•World Development•1975

  • Attitude change revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey James, Efraim Gutkind•World Development•1985

  • Thailand's Field-Worker Evaluation Project

    Yawarat Porapakkham, Peter J Donaldson et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1975

  • Governmental Population Incentives

    Robert M Veatch•Studies in Family Planning•1977

  • Incentives, Reproductive Behavior, and Integrated Community Development in Asia

    Henry P David•Studies in Family Planning•1982

  • Evaluation of the First Year of the Educational Savings Program in Taiwan

    C M Wang, S Y Chen•Studies in Family Planning•1973

  • The Promotion of Family Planning by Financial Payments

    John G F Cleland, John Cleland et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1991

  • Theories of Attitude Change and the “Beyond Family Planning” Debate

    Open Access•Thomas J Crawford•Journal of Social Issues•1974

  • Incentives and Reinforcement

    Open Access•William M Wiest, Leslie H Squier•Journal of Social Issues•1974

  • Inequality rose from above, so it shall fall again

    Open Access•Hanno Scholtz•International Journal of…•2010

Citations per year0.26
Citation span1972 - 2010 (39)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae