Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Relative Impacts of Vertical and Integrated FP/MCH Programs in Rural Nepal

Bibliographic Data

ID10795582
AuthorsJ M Tuladhar, Jayanti Tuladhar (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, corresponding author), John Stoeckel
Year1982
Volume13
Issue10
Pages275
Publication date1982-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1965850
OpenAlexW2046892070
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited1

The objectives of this analysis were to assess the probable impacts of vertical and integrated FP/MCH programs on family planning (knowledge, use, and intentions to use), family size preferences, fertility, and mortality (child and infant). The following discussion summarizes and draws conclusions regarding the results of this investigation. The vertical program showed a greater impact on knowledge of family planning than the integrated program. Increases in knowledge between 1975 and 1978 while controlling for social and demographic variables were greater in the vertical than the integrated areas. Multiple classification analysis at both household and village levels showed that the vertical program was a better predictor of knowledge and changes in knowledge than the integrated program. In addition, the vertical program showed consistently higher proportions of women with awareness of family planning among those segments of the population that could have the greatest impact on fertility reduction in the future--namely, the younger women who are either childless or just beginning their childbearing and those with husbands who have little or no education. Neither the vertical nor the integrated FP/MCH program showed an impact on current use or ever use of family planning. The very low levels and changes in levels of these factors between the programs showed almost no difference throughout the selected demographic and socioeconomic groups. In both program areas the proportions of ever use and current use increased substantially with the number of living sons, exceeding 14 percent and 10 percent, respectively, among women with three or more sons. There were virtually no family planning users or ever users among women with no sons. This appears to indicate that "son preference" (documented in the Nepal Fertility Survey) is an important factor affecting the incidence of family planning practice and may be a formidable obstacle to a substantial reduction in fertility. Family limitation generally may not be taken seriously until a couple has produced the desired number of sons. Hence, until the value of sons (perhaps as sources of labor, financial support and security in old age, and as performers of funeral rites for fathers) can be altered it is unlikely that a reduction in fertility beyond certain levels could occur. The vertical program showed a slightly greater impact on future intentions to use family planning than the integrated program.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)An analysis of the impacts of vertical and integrated family planning/maternal child health programs on family planning, family size preferences, fertility, and infant and child mortality was conducted utilizing the 1st longitudinal sample survey data collected in Nepal. Findings indicate that neither program demonstrated an impact on contraceptive use. However, the vertical program (organized from a central office, with 4 regional offices, 40 district offices, and 492 clinic and village based service centers) was shown to have a greater impact on family planning knowledge, future intentions to use family planning, fertility, and infant mortality

Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Family planning · Fertility · Geography · Population · Research methodology · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Psychology

  • Alternative healthcare delivery arrangements in Nepal

    Open Access•Pramila Rai, Denise A O’Connor et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Family Planning Field Research Projects

    Andrew Fisher, Andrew A Fisher et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1983

  • A Decade of Nepal's Family Planning Program

    Shyam Thapa•Studies in Family Planning•1989

  • A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems

    Open Access•R Atun, T de Jongh et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2010

  • Family Limitation and the Fertility Transition

    Open Access•John Knodel•Population Studies•1977

Citations per year0.09
Citation span1983 - 2025 (43)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae