On-site HIV Testing in Resource-poor Settings
Is One Rapid Test Enough
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10796136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Wilkinson (0000-0001-5934-3540, corresponding author), Nomsa Wilkinson, Chantal Lombard (0000-0002-2136-6533, Hlabisa Hospital), Carl Lombard, Des Martin (National Institute for Communicable Diseases), Alan Smith (0000-0003-3891-6543, University of KwaZulu-Natal), Katherine Floyd (0000-0001-8574-9480, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Ron Ballard |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 352 |
| Publication date | 1997-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Family Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2137870 |
| OpenAlex | W2331843269 |
| Language | EN |
Objective: To determine the feasibility, accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a rapid, on-site, HIV testing strategy in a rural hospital, and to assess its impact on test turnaround time and the proportion of patients post-test counselled. Design: Prospective comparison of two testing strategies |double rapid test on-site versus central enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based testing|, and an economic evaluation. Setting: Hlabisa Hospital, a rural South African district hospital. Patients: A total of 454 consecutive adult inpatients requiring and consenting to HIV testing as part of their clinical management. Main outcome measures: Concordance between rapid tests, and between the rapid and ELISA strategies, test turnaround time, proportion of patients post-test counselled, and cost-effectiveness. Results: HIV seroprevalence was 49.6%. Both rapid tests were concordant in all patients |one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of probability, 99.3-100|. The rapid strategy was 100% sensitive (95%, CI, 97.9-100) and 99.6% specific (95%, CI, 97.2-100) compared with the ELISA strategy. The mean interval between ordering a test and post-test counselling fell from 21 days prior to the introduction of the rapid test strategy to 4.6 days after its introduction (P < 0.00001). The proportion of patients post-test counselled increased to 96%, from 17% after the introduction of the rapid test strategy (P< 0.00001). By using a double rapid test strategy the cost per patient post-test counselled was almost halved to US$ 11. Accuracy of the rapid strategy was not substantially increased by performing two tests. Conclusion: In high prevalence, resource-poor settings, rapid, on-site HIV testing is feasible, accurate and highly cost-effective, substantially increasing the number of patients post-test counselled. A single rapid test may be sufficient
Concordance · Confidence interval · Point-of-care testing · Test (biology · Test strategy · HIV Research and Treatment · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Immunology · Internal Medicine · Medicine
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |