Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10799309 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Inkeri Koskinen, Kristina H Rolin (0000-0003-3893-7184) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Pages | 191-198 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3681 • E-ISSN: 1879-2510 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.001 |
| PMID | 34954458 |
| OpenAlex | W4200465521 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 23 |
In this paper, we argue that the new demarcation problem does not need to be framed as the problem of defining a set of necessary and jointly sufficient criteria for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable roles that non-epistemic values can play in science. We introduce an alternative way of framing the problem and defend an open-ended list of criteria that can be used in demarcation. Applying such criteria requires context-specific work that clarifies which principles should be used, and possibly leads to the identification of new principles - which then can be added to the open-ended list. We illustrate our approach by examining a context where distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable value influences in science is both needed and tricky: transdisciplinary research
Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Framing (construction · Identification (biology · Management science · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
On epistemic risks in research method validation
Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem
Concerns about Contextual Values in Science and the Legitimate/Illegitimate Distinction
Value landscapes in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and assessment
The value of values
The New Chimera for Values in Science
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling
Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research
From science to policy through transdisciplinary research
Uses of Value Judgments in Science
The Third Wave of Science Studies
Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues
Bias and values in scientific research
A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem
Douglas on values
State of the field
Science, politics and regulation
Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments
Inductive Risk and Values in Science
Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk
Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science
Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity
What is progress in transdisciplinary research
The TD Wheel
A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |