Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What is wrong with the miracle argument

Bibliographic Data

ID10799397
AuthorsMartin Carrier
Year1991
Volume22
Issue1
Pages23-36
Publication date1991-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in History and Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3681 • E-ISSN: 1879-2510
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/0039-3681(91)90013-i
OpenAlexW1982095996
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited4

Argument (complex analysis · Biology · Critical realism (philosophy of perception · Direct and indirect realism · Epistemology · Miracle · Realism · Scientific realism · Scientific theory · Theology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Is the Probabilistic No-Miracle Argument Inferentially Fallacious

    Open Access•Kristi Y Lee•Philosophy of Science•2026

  • Afirmando o conseqüente

    Open Access•Silvio Seno Chibeni•Scientiae Studia•2006

  • Escribir el espacio entre la auctoritas, la lengua hablada y el régimen agrario

    Open Access•Juan Larrea, Juan José Larrea•Studia Historica Historia Medieval•2019

  • Theoretical Virtues in Science

    Samuel Schindler•Theoretical Virtues in Science•2018

  • Philosophy of Experimental Biology

    Open Access•Marcel Weber•Philosophy of experimental biology•2004

  • Resisting Scientific Realism

    Open Access•K Brad Wray•Resisting Scientific Realism•2018

  • Social Theory of International Politics

    Open Access•Alexander Wendt•Social Theory of International…•1999

  • Representing genes

    Open Access•Marcel Weber•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1998

  • Idealtypen und das Ziel der Soziologie

    Open Access•Grace Albert, Gert Albert•Berliner Journal für Soziologie•2007

  • Tinbergen’s four questions and the debate between scientific realism and selectionism

    Open Access•Kristi Y Lee•Synthese•2021

  • Reconsidering the miracle argument on the supposition of transient underdetermination

    Open Access•P Hoyningen-Huene•Synthese•2011

  • Success and truth in the realism/anti-realism debate

    Open Access•K Brad Wray•Synthese•2013

  • Reactionary responses to the Bad Lot Objection

    Open Access•Finnur Dellsén•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2017

  • What is right with the miracle argument

    Open Access•Martin Carrier•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1993

  • The miracle argument for realism

    Open Access•Paul E Meehl•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1992

  • A new twist to the No Miracles Argument for the success of science

    Open Access•K Brad Wray•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • The past vs. the tiny

    Open Access•Derek D Turner•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Special sciences (or

    Open Access•J A Fodor•Synthese•1974

  • Truth and scientific progress

    Open Access•Jarrett Leplin•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1981

  • Whewell's Consilience of Inductions–An Evaluation

    Open Access•Menachem Fisch•Philosophy of Science•1985

  • Meaning and the Moral Sciences (Routledge Revivals)

    Hilary Putnam•Meaning and the Moral Sciences…•2010

Unique citing works17
Citations per year0,5
Citation span1992 - 2026 (35)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae