Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry

Bibliographic Data

ID10799548
AuthorsTorsten Wilholt (0000-0002-0729-5476)
Year2022
Volume91
Pages86-93
Publication date2022-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in History and Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3681 • E-ISSN: 1879-2510
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.009
PMID34891050
OpenAlexW4200328331
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited33

Epistemic virtue · Epistemology · Epistemology of Wikipedia · Objectivity (philosophy · Philosophy of science · Social epistemology · Sociology · Virtue · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • The non-epistemic dimension, at last a key component in mainstream theoretical approaches to teaching the nature of science

    Open Access•Antonio García‐Carmona•Science & Education•2025

  • Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests

    Peter Zuk•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Caveat Auditor

    Justin P Mcbrayer•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Partisan science and the democratic legitimacy ideal

    Open Access•Hannah Hilligardt•Synthese•2023

  • Values, bias and replicability

    Open Access•Marek Sikorski•Synthese•2024

  • On “minor” adverse effects

    Open Access•Ilvie Prince•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2025

  • Varying Evidential Standards as a Matter of Justice

    Ahmad Elabbar•The British Journal for the…•2023

  • Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

    Open Access•Leslie K John, G Loewenstein et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • The Role of Trust in Knowledge

    John Hardwig•The Journal of Philosophy•1991

  • A Semi-Empirical Approach to Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise

    Open Access•Stefan Rahmstorf•Science•2007

  • Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling

    Open Access•Kristen Intemann•European Journal for Philosophy…•2015

  • Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility

    Open Access•Monya Baker•Nature•2016

  • False-Positive Psychology

    Open Access•Joseph P Simmons, L D Nelson et al.•Psychological Science•2011

  • Biographies of scientific objects

    Lorraine Daston•Biographies of scientific objects•2000

  • Climate change prediction

    Open Access•Keynyn Brysse, Naomi Oreskes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2012

  • Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge☆

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Violetta Muselli•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • Seepage

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Naomi Oreskes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Expertise

    Open Access•Mike Carrier, Martin Carrier•Analyse & Kritik•2010

  • Aimless science

    Open Access•Darrell P Rowbottom•Synthese•2014

  • Inductive risk and the contexts of communication

    Open Access•Simeon John, Stephen John•Synthese•2015

  • The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity

    Open Access•Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Synthese•2004

  • Bias and values in scientific research

    Open Access•Torsten Wilholt•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2009

  • Science, truth and dictatorship

    Open Access•Stephen John•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019

  • The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments

    Open Access•Richard Rudner•Philosophy of Science•1953

  • Inductive Risk and Values in Science

    Open Access•Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Philosophy of Science•2000

  • Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk

    Open Access•Matthew J Brown•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • What Evidence in Evidence-Based Medicine

    Open Access•John Worrall, John L Worrall•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • Why Replication Is Overrated

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Philosophy of Science•2019

  • Should Some Knowledge Be Forbidden? The Case of Cognitive Differences Research

    Open Access•Janet A Kourany•Philosophy of Science•2016

  • Epistemic Trust in Science

    Torsten Wilholt•The British Journal for the…•2013

  • Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy

    Open Access•Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•The British Journal for the…•2021

  • On evidence and evidence-based medicine

    Open Access•Maya J Goldenberg•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis

    Open Access•Fernando Romero•Philosophy Compass•2019

Citations per year2.33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae