Austrian economics without extreme apriorism
A critical reply
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10807928 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johnm Lipski (0000-0002-3285-6466, Leibniz University Hannover, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 199 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 10331-10341 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-021-03249-7 |
| OpenAlex | W3173992259 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 11 |
In this paper I will analyze and criticize Linsbichler’s recent proposition to interpret the fundamental axiom of Praxeology as analytic. I will first describe Linsbichler’s problem situation. I will then describe and criticize Linsbichler’s proposed solution to his problem; namely his interpretation of the fundamental axiom as analytic. I will argue that this idea does not fully utilize critical potentials that are available to improve the fundamental axiom. I will propose an alternative interpretation which I call the ‘critical interpretation’ that conserves the progressive aspects of Linsbichler’s proposal while eliminating undesirable ones
Axiom · Causation · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Mathematical economics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of science · Praxeology · Proposition · Economic Theory and Institutions · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy, Science, and History
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |