The function of modal judgment and the Kantian gap
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10808458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jessica Leech (0000-0001-9731-5882, King's College London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 198 |
| Issue | S13 |
| Pages | 3193-3212 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-018-1810-z |
| OpenAlex | W2803485861 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
What is the function of modal judgment? Why do we (need to be able to) make judgments of possibility and necessity? Or are such judgments, in fact, dispensable? This paper introduces and develops an answer to these questions based on Kant’s remarks in section 76 of the Critique of Judgment. Here, Kant appears to argue the following: that a capacity to make modal judgments using (categorial) modal concepts is required for a capacity for objective representation, in light of our split cognitive architecture. This split cognitive architecture leaves room for a mismatch between our concepts and intuitions and, Kant argues, that is why we need modal concepts and modal judgments. In this paper, I develop this account of the function of modal judgment and to explore the extent to which it may improve upon contemporary alternatives. I focus on one particularly important challenge for the account: to explain why a distinction between the actual and the possible, rather than merely a distinction between the actual and the non - actual , is required. In order to answer this question, I supplement the account with a particular way of thinking about objectivity
Cognition · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Function (biology) · Metaphysics · Modal · Objectivity (philosophy) · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Political science · Representation (politics) · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
Modal Knowledge, Evolution, and Counterfactuals
Critique of Pure Reason
Necessary Beings
Origins of Objectivity
Critique of the Power of Judgment
The Philosophy of Philosophy
Rational Animals
Truth and Objectivity
Modality
Modal Epistemology After Rationalism
Essence and Modality
Logical Necessity and Other Essays
Agnosticism About Other Worlds
Belief in Absolute Necessity
Manifest Reality
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |