Apperception and the 1787 transcendental deduction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10813402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Howell, Robert J Howell (0000-0002-8766-5544, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 385-448 |
| Publication date | 1981-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01073777 |
| OpenAlex | W2026720048 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
Apperception · Calculus (dental) · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of science · Transcendental number · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Kritik der reinen Vernunft
Attitudes De Dicto and De Se
"Infinity and Kant's Conception of the "Possibility of Experience
Frege on Demonstratives
Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science with selections from the Critique of pure reason
The Bounds of Sense
A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |