Cognitive ontology and the search for neural mechanisms
Three foundational problems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10813618 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jolien C Francken (0000-0001-5141-7672, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Marc Slors (0000-0002-4459-2859, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Carl F Craver (0000-0002-0289-1957, Washington University in St. Louis) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 200 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-022-03701-2 |
| OpenAlex | W3136399569 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 71 |
The central task of cognitive neuroscience to map cognitive capacities to neural mechanisms faces three interlocking conceptual problems that together frame the problem of cognitive ontology. First, they must establish which tasks elicit which cognitive capacities, and specifically when different tasks elicit the same capacity. To address this operationalization problem , scientists often assess whether the tasks engage the same neural mechanisms. But to determine whether mechanisms are of the same or different kinds, we need to solve the abstraction problem by determining which mechanistic differences are and are not relevant, and also the boundary problem by distinguishing the mechanism from its background conditions. Solving these problems, in turn, requires understanding how cognitive capacities are elicited in tasks. These three problems, which have been noted and discussed elsewhere in the literature, together form a ‘cycle of kinds’ that frames the central problem-space of cognitive ontology. We describe this cycle to clarify the intellectual challenges facing the cognitive ontologist and to reveal the kind of iterative process by which ontological revision in cognitive neuroscience is likely to unfold
Abstraction · Cognition · Cognitive model · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Mechanism (biology) · Ontology · Operationalization · Process (computing) · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Cognitive Neuroscience · Computer Science · Neuroscience · Psychology
Duration and Externalized Intelligence
Cognitive Variation
El rol de la agencia en la identidad híbrida de los pacientes neurotecnológicos
LTP Revisited
Causal complexity and psychological measurement
A Bidimensional Cognitive Ontology
Three conceptual clarifications about syntax and the brain
Interpreting continuism as a mechanistic thesis
Discovering Complexity
Inventing Temperature
Naming the Mind
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Neurocognitive Mechanisms
Explaining the Brain
The Concept of Validity.
What Realism Implies and What it Does Not
Mechanisms and natural kinds
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
On the ability to inhibit thought and action
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm
Précis of The Intentional Stance
How Do Expectations Shape Perception?
From commonsense to science, and back
Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited
Beyond the Platonic Brain
Reconsidering ‘spatial memory’ and the Morris water maze
What exactly is stabilized when phenomena are stabilized
The multiplicity of experimental protocols
The causal situationist account of constitutive relevance
Idealization and abstraction
Mechanisms in psychology
Rip it up and start again
Cognitive Ontology and Region- versus Network-Oriented Analyses
Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences
Phenomena and Objects of Research in the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences
Abstraction and the Organization of Mechanisms
Making Time
Registration Pluralism and the Cartographic Approach to Data Aggregation across Brains
Operationism in psychology
Construct validity in psychological tests
Mining the Brain for a New Taxonomy of the Mind
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |