Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cognitive ontology and the search for neural mechanisms

Three foundational problems

Bibliographic Data

ID10813618
AuthorsJolien C Francken (0000-0001-5141-7672, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Marc Slors (0000-0002-4459-2859, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Carl F Craver (0000-0002-0289-1957, Washington University in St. Louis)
Year2022
Volume200
Issue5
Publication date2022-09-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSynthese (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11229-022-03701-2
OpenAlexW3136399569
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited71

The central task of cognitive neuroscience to map cognitive capacities to neural mechanisms faces three interlocking conceptual problems that together frame the problem of cognitive ontology. First, they must establish which tasks elicit which cognitive capacities, and specifically when different tasks elicit the same capacity. To address this operationalization problem , scientists often assess whether the tasks engage the same neural mechanisms. But to determine whether mechanisms are of the same or different kinds, we need to solve the abstraction problem by determining which mechanistic differences are and are not relevant, and also the boundary problem by distinguishing the mechanism from its background conditions. Solving these problems, in turn, requires understanding how cognitive capacities are elicited in tasks. These three problems, which have been noted and discussed elsewhere in the literature, together form a ‘cycle of kinds’ that frames the central problem-space of cognitive ontology. We describe this cycle to clarify the intellectual challenges facing the cognitive ontologist and to reveal the kind of iterative process by which ontological revision in cognitive neuroscience is likely to unfold

Abstraction · Cognition · Cognitive model · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Mechanism (biology) · Ontology · Operationalization · Process (computing) · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Cognitive Neuroscience · Computer Science · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • Duration and Externalized Intelligence

    Open Access•Bilal Hamamra•Human Arenas•2026

  • Cognitive Variation

    Open Access•Zina B Ward•Philosophy Compass•2022

  • El rol de la agencia en la identidad híbrida de los pacientes neurotecnológicos

    Open Access•Jorge Ignacio Fuentes, Abel Wajnerman Paz•Revista de filosofía•2024

  • LTP Revisited

    Open Access•Jonathan Najenson•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2024

  • Causal complexity and psychological measurement

    Open Access•Markus I Eronen•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • A Bidimensional Cognitive Ontology

    Open Access•Abel Wajnerman Paz, Daniel Rojas-Líbano•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Three conceptual clarifications about syntax and the brain

    Open Access•Cas W Coopmans, Emiliano Zaccarella•Frontiers in Language Sciences•2023

  • Interpreting continuism as a mechanistic thesis

    Open Access•José Carlos Camillo•Synthese•2025

  • Discovering Complexity

    William Bechtel, R C Richardson•Discovering Complexity•2010

  • Inventing Temperature

    Haṡok Chang•Inventing Temperature•2004

  • Naming the Mind

    Kurt Danziger•Naming the Mind•1997

  • From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure

    Open Access•Tim Shallice•From Neuropsychology to Mental…•1988

  • Neurocognitive Mechanisms

    Gualtiero Piccinini•Neurocognitive Mechanisms•2020

  • Explaining the Brain

    Carl F Craver•Explaining the brain•2007

  • The Concept of Validity.

    Denny Borsboom, Gideon J Mellenbergh et al.•Psychological Review•2004

  • What Realism Implies and What it Does Not

    Open Access•R N Boyd•dialectica•1989

  • Mechanisms and natural kinds

    Carl F Craver•Philosophical Psychology•2009

  • Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?

    Open Access•Russell A Poldrack, R POLDRACK•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2006

  • On the ability to inhibit thought and action

    Gordon D Logan, William B Cowan•Psychological Review•1984

  • Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm

    Open Access•Frederick Verbruggen, Gordon D Logan•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2008

  • Précis of The Intentional Stance

    Open Access•Daniel C Dennett•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1988

  • How Do Expectations Shape Perception?

    Open Access•Floris P De Lange, Micha Heilbron et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2018

  • From commonsense to science, and back

    Open Access•Jolien C Francken, Marc Slors•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited

    Open Access•Carl F Craver, Stuart Glennan et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Beyond the Platonic Brain

    Open Access•Marta Viola•Synthese•2021

  • Reconsidering ‘spatial memory’ and the Morris water maze

    Open Access•Jacqueline A Sullivan, Jacqueline Sullivan•Synthese•2010

  • What exactly is stabilized when phenomena are stabilized

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Synthese•2011

  • The multiplicity of experimental protocols

    Open Access•Jacqueline A Sullivan, Jacqueline Sullivan•Synthese•2009

  • The causal situationist account of constitutive relevance

    Open Access•Emily Prychitko•Synthese•2021

  • Idealization and abstraction

    Open Access•Arnon Levy•Synthese•2021

  • Mechanisms in psychology

    Open Access•Chanel Stinson, Catherine Stinson•Synthese•2016

  • Rip it up and start again

    Open Access•David Colaço•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Cognitive Ontology and Region- versus Network-Oriented Analyses

    Open Access•Colin Klein•Philosophy of Science•2012

  • Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences

    Open Access•Jacqueline Anne Sullivan, Jacqueline Sullivan•Philosophy of Science•2016

  • Phenomena and Objects of Research in the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Abstraction and the Organization of Mechanisms

    Open Access•Arnon Levy, William Bechtel•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • Making Time

    Eran Tal•The British Journal for the…•2016

  • Registration Pluralism and the Cartographic Approach to Data Aggregation across Brains

    Open Access•Zina B Ward•The British Journal for the…•2022

  • Operationism in psychology

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Journal of the History of the…•2005

  • Construct validity in psychological tests

    Lee J Cronbach, Paul E Meehl•Psychological Bulletin•1955

  • Mining the Brain for a New Taxonomy of the Mind

    Open Access•Michael L Anderson•Philosophy Compass•2015

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae