Speak no ill of the dead
The dead as a social group
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10814366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tom Kaspers (0000-0003-3216-4176, University of Stirling, corresponding author), Jacob LiBrizzi (0000-0003-0917-2047, University of Stirling), Duccio Calosi (0000-0002-3678-4754, Universitat de Barcelona), Yoichi Kobe |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 200 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-022-03512-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4229046014 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
In her recent article “The Ontology of Social Groups”, Thomasson (Synthese 196:4829–4845, 2019) argues that social groups can be characterized in terms of the norms that surround them. We show that according to Thomasson’s normativity-based criterion, the dead constitute a social group, since there are widespread and well-defined social norms as to how to treat the dead, such as the norm expressed in the title (“Speak no ill of the dead”). We argue that the example of the dead must not be interpreted as a counterexample to this criterion, and that, rather, there are good reasons to think of the dead as a genuine social group. Furthermore, the dead as a social group exist, regardless of whether or not the dead (i.e. the members of this social group) exist as persons. This view is clearly incompatible with the idea that social groups can be explained by citing features of their members, which is why we take the case of the dead to pose a challenge for the thesis of individualism. We consider the ontological implications of this example and suggest that social groups ought to be seen as reifications of social norms. Another implication of taking the dead to be a social group is that the presence of external norms is sufficient for the existence of a social group, and therefore internal norms are not necessary. We defend this implication against some potential theoretical and moral problems
Counterexample · Epistemology · Group (periodic table) · Individualism · Metaphysics · Norm (philosophy) · Philosophy of language · Political science · Social group · Social philosophy · Social relation · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Staying Alive
The Original Sin of Cognition
Reasons
Rationality Through Reasoning
Modal Logic as Metaphysics
Categories We Live By
The ontology of social groups
Half-Naturalized Social Kinds
Metasemantics. New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning
Easy Ontology without Deflationary Metaontology
The Social Construction of What
Instrumental Rationality
Death and Nonexistence
On Social Facts
The Metaphysics of Social Groups
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |