Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A ‘Place’ of Shenzheners? Urban Renewal, Indirect Stakeholders and Relational Place‐Framing in Hubei Old Village, Shenzhen, China

Bibliographic Data

ID10833166
AuthorsMengdi Wu (0000-0003-4837-993X, Department of Applied Social Sciences The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China), Yongcheng Xu (Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd Guangzhou China), R Jiang (0009-0009-9104-3324, Department of Social Sciences and Policy Studies The Education University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China)
Year2026
Publication date2026-02-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-747X • E-ISSN: 1467-9663
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/tesg.70071
OpenAlexW7130380403
LanguageEN
References cited60

Existing studies on anti‐urban redevelopment struggles focus primarily on the role of local communities and their interactions with state–capital coalitions. Although considerable attention has been paid to the resistance of local residents, far less emphasis has been placed on the practices of indirect stakeholders, who do not reside locally but may have conflicting interests with local residents. Through a detailed analysis with various types of qualitative data, this study examines the redevelopment of Hubei Old Village as an intriguing case to illustrate the diverse forms of participation by indirect stakeholders in contested redevelopment processes. By drawing on and contributing to the relational place‐framing thesis, this study finds that indirect stakeholders in the Hubei case cannot be treated uniformly as mediators or representatives of local residents. Instead, their engagement in the preservation of the old village shows internal contradictions and is motivated primarily by their affective connections to the place rather than material benefits. Moreover, the place‐frames they strategically constructed in different phases significantly (re)shape the pathways and outcomes of the redevelopment project. This study enriches the literature on China's urban governance and extends existing frameworks for capturing the complexity, diversity and uncertainty of state–society relations in urban redevelopment

China · Corporate governance · Diversity (politics · Qualitative research · Redevelopment · Resistance (ecology · Urban regeneration · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Putting inclusion into practice

    Open Access•Simone Van De Wetering, Martijn Groenleer•Urban Research & Practice•2024

  • From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism

    D C Harvey, David Harvey•Geografiska Annaler Series B…•1989

  • The state acts through the market

    Open Access•Fulong Wu•Dialogues in Human Geography•2020

  • Managing Social Stability

    Open Access•Wang Juan•Journal of East Asian Studies•2015

  • Challenging, but not Trouble-Making

    Yuan Yao, Rongbin Han•Journal of Contemporary China•2015

  • Property-Led Redevelopment in Post-Reform China

    Shenjing He, Fulong Wu•Journal of Urban Affairs•2005

  • The Political Economy of Growth Machines

    Harvey Molotch•Journal of Urban Affairs•1993

  • Participatory urban redevelopment in Chinese cities amid accelerated urbanization

    Zhumin Xu, George C S Lin•Journal of Urban Affairs•2018

  • The entrepreneurial city

    Open Access•Tim Hall, P Hubbard•Progress in Human Geography•1996

  • Rethinking China’s urban governance

    Open Access•Fulong Wu, Fangzhu Zhang•Progress in Human Geography•2022

  • The insurgent intellectuals in elite capture

    Open Access•Zihang Zhou, Jianfa Shen•Urban Geography•2025

  • Social Movements in Urban Society

    Byron Miller, Walter J Nicholls et al.•Urban Geography•2013

  • Ambivalence in place attachment

    Open Access•Xin Li, Reinout Kleinhans et al.•Housing Studies•2019

  • Top-down intergovernmental relations and power-building from below in China's urban redevelopment

    Open Access•Yang Yu, Yu Yang et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen

    Open Access•Yanpeng Jiang, Nalini Mohabir et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Planner-led collaborative governance and the urban form of urban villages in redevelopment

    Open Access•Yue Gong, Bin Li et al.•Cities•2023

  • Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management

    Open Access•Yang Liu, Xin Jin et al.•Cities•2022

  • Ally, deterrence, or leverage in the tripartite game? The effects of indirect stakeholders in historic urban regeneration

    Open Access•Jimin Zhong, Bin Li et al.•Cities•2024

  • Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters

    Open Access•Hyun Bang Shin•Cities•2010

  • Urban community regeneration and community vitality revitalization through participatory planning in China

    Open Access•Eddie C M Hui, Eddie Chi-Man Hui et al.•Cities•2021

  • Paradox between neoliberal urban redevelopment, heritage conservation, and community needs

    Open Access•Xue Wang, Wang Xue et al.•Cities•2019

  • Rethinking growth coalition in urban village redevelopment

    Open Access•Zhengtao Zhang, Yong Liu et al.•Habitat International•2022

  • The third sector in collaborative planning

    Open Access•Yuan Yuan, Yujie Chen et al.•Habitat International•2021

  • Is the incipient Chinese civil society playing a role in regenerating historic urban areas? Evidence from Nanjing, Suzhou and Shanghai

    Open Access•Giulio Verdini•Habitat International•2015

  • Urban redevelopment as multi-scalar planning and contestation

    Open Access•Chengguo Zhang, Xun Li•Habitat International•2016

  • The Right to the City and Critical Reflections on China's Property Rights Activism

    Open Access•Hyun Bang Shin•Antipode•2013

  • Ghosts, Memory, and the Right to the Divided City

    Open Access•J Nagle•Antipode•2017

  • Extracting Value from the City

    Open Access•R Weber•Antipode•2002

  • China's Emerging Neoliberal Urbanism

    Open Access•Shenjing He, Fulong Wu•Antipode•2009

  • Place attachment as a motivation for community preservation

    Open Access•Khaled Alawadi•Urban Studies•2017

  • Reconfiguration of state–society relations

    Open Access•Chen Li, Mark Wang et al.•Urban Studies•2021

  • Heterogeneity of public participation in urban redevelopment in Chinese cities

    Open Access•Lin Zhang, Yanliu Lin et al.•Urban Studies•2020

  • Who Cashed the Rent Gap? An Alternative Narration of a Shantytown Renovation Project in Nanjing, China

    Open Access•Chunhui Liu, Yaqi Yuan et al.•Tijdschrift voor Economische en…•2024

  • Expanding Frontiers of Commercial Gentrification

    Open Access•Xing Huang, Hao Gu•Tijdschrift voor Economische en…•2024

  • Place‐framing against automobility in Montreal

    Open Access•Sophie L Van Neste, Deborah G Martin•Transactions of the Institute of…•2017

  • Relational place‐making

    Open Access•Joseph Pierce, John R Pierce et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•2010

  • Heritage conflict evolution

    Open Access•Zhen Li, Yanliu Lin et al.•Geoforum•2024

  • Dancing with the Devil? Gentrification and Urban Struggles in, through and against the State in Nanjing, China

    Open Access•Hao Chen, Yunpeng Zhang•Geoforum•2021

  • Thinking temporally when thinking relationally

    Open Access•Anna Y Zhang, Amy Y Zhang•Geoforum•2018

  • Collective memories, place-framing and the politics of imaginary futures in sustainability transitions and transformation

    Open Access•Giuseppe Feola, Michael K Goodman et al.•Geoforum•2022

  • Place-Framing” as Place-Making

    Deborah G Martin•Annals of the Association of…•2003

  • That market has no quality

    Open Access•Emil Van Eck•Transactions of the Institute of…•2021

  • Placing Lefebvre

    Open Access•Joseph Pierce, John R Pierce et al.•Antipode•2015

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The Right to Envision the City? The Emerging Vision Conflicts in Redeveloping Historic Nanjing, China

    Open Access•Hao Chen, Lili Wang et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2020

  • Micro-regeneration and participatory governance

    Open Access•Ying Wang, Fulong Wu•Journal of Chinese Governance•2025

  • New Globalism, New Urbanism

    Open Access•N T Smith, Neil Smith•Antipode•2002

  • Rights in places

    Open Access•Joseph Pierce, John R Pierce et al.•Geoforum•2016

  • When large-scale regeneration becomes an engine of urban growth

    Open Access•Veronica Conte, Guido Anselmi•Environment and Planning A…•2022

  • Urban Entrepreneurialism Vs Market Society

    Open Access•Yongshen Liu, Y Yau•International Journal of Urban…•2020

  • The Power of Place in Place Attachment

    Open Access•Alexander C Diener, Joshua Hagen•Geographical Review•2022

  • Drawing up the missing link

    Open Access•George C S Lin•Environment and Planning A…•2021

  • Gentrification and Its Variegated Emplacements

    Shaun S K Teo•Annals of the American…•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae