The exegesis of Q. 2
106 And the Islamic theories of naskh: mā nansakh min āya aw nansahā na'ti bi khairin minhā aw mithlīhā
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10840656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Burton (0000-0003-3157-3621, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 452-469 |
| Publication date | 1985-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0041977x0003843x |
| OpenAlex | W2100253334 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
The story of the exegesis of Q. 2: 106 cannot be told briefly, on account of the quite appaling degree of muddle which has bedevilled the Muslim discusions of this verse. The greatest imaginable confusion regins as the definition of the term naskh and as to its supposed meaning(s). For that reason, it may be convenient first to set out the following formulae which represent the classical theories of naksh . There are, in fact, two such theories
Art · Confusion · Epistemology · Exegesis · Islam · Literature · Meaning (existential · Psychoanalysis · Set (abstract data type · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Computer Science · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Studies and History · Philosophy · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |