Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Automating accountability? Privacy policies, data transparency, and the third party problem

Bibliographic Data

ID10854182
AuthorsDavid Lie (0000-0002-2000-6827, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Lisa M Austin (0000-0002-9644-9421, University of Toronto), Peter Yi Ping Sun (Bloomberg, New York, United States), Wenjun Qiu (University of Toronto)
Year2022
Volume72
Issue2
Pages155-188
Publication date2022-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueUniversity of Toronto Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-0220 • E-ISSN: 1710-1174
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/utlj-2020-0136
OpenAlexW4200610885
LanguageEN

We have a data transparency problem. Currently, one of the main mechanisms we have to understand data flows is through the self-reporting that organizations provide through privacy policies. These suffer from many well-known problems, problems that are becoming more acute with the increasing complexity of the data ecosystem and the role of third parties – the affiliates, partners, processors, ad agencies, analytic services, and data brokers involved in the contemporary data practices of organizations. In this article, we argue that automating privacy policy analysis can improve the usability of privacy policies as a transparency mechanism. Our argument has five parts. First, we claim that we need to shift from thinking about privacy policies as a transparency mechanism that enhances consumer choice and see them as a transparency mechanism that enhances meaningful accountability. Second, we discuss a research tool that we prototyped, called AppTrans (for Application Transparency), which can detect inconsistencies between the declarations in a privacy policy and the actions the mobile application can potentially take if it is used. We used AppTrans to test seven hundred applications and found that 59.5 per cent were collecting data in ways that were not declared in their policies. The vast majority of the discrepancies were due to third party data collection such as advertising and analytics. Third, we outline the follow-on research we did to extend AppTrans to analyse the information sharing of mobile applications with third parties, with mixed results. Fourth, we situate our findings in relation to the third party issues that came to light in the recent Cambridge Analytica scandal and the calls from regulators for enhanced technical safeguards in managing these third party relationships. Fifth, we discuss some of the limitations of privacy policy automation as a strategy for enhanced data transparency and the policy implications of these limitations

Accountability · Analytics · Argument (complex analysis · Business · Computer security · Data science · Data sharing · Information privacy · Internet privacy · Political science · Privacy by Design · Privacy policy · Transparency (behavior · Usability · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae