Research–Practice Relationship
The Case Of Studying Sibling Sexual Abuse
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10895487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dafna Tener (0000-0001-7688-3303, The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bcz066 |
| OpenAlex | W2948577954 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 45 |
The research–practice relationship enables practitioners and non-academic researchers to contribute in creating knowledge and form partnerships with academic researchers. Despite the availability of conceptual frameworks and literature describing relations between researchers and practitioners in several disciplines, including social work, descriptions of the inner workings of these relations in the area of child sexual abuse are lacking. The present article presents such a relationship between researchers from a school of social work and practitioners from a Child Advocacy Centre (CAC) in Israel, in the specific context of studying sibling sexual abuse (SSA). It highlights the unique aspects of the relationship and analyses its development based on the first three stages proposed by Jones and Sherr. Specifically, (i) the practitioners-as-subjects stage, characterised by researched dominance, focused on document analysis of SSA cases; (ii) the engaged research stage, characterised by rapport between the two parties, developed in focus groups with CAC staff and (iii) the practitioner-involved research, characterised by joint creative work, included co-authoring a booklet for professionals dealing with sexual abuse cases. The article concludes with a discussion of the necessary conditions for and benefits of forming such relationships in the context of studying complex phenomena such as SSA.
Child sexual abuse · Context (archaeology) · Developmental psychology · Dominance (genetics) · Poison control · Sexual abuse · Sibling · Suicide prevention · Child Abuse and Trauma · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice
Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research
The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research
Re‐conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work
Community Engagement in Research
Children’s Advocacy Centers (Barnahus) in Sweden
Developing good practitioner research
The Challenges of Collaboration for Academic and Community Partners in a Research Partnership
The Role of Relationships in Connecting Social Work Research and Evidence-Based Practice
From research to practice
Best practice guidelines for health service professionals who receive initial disclosures of sibling sexual abuse
School-Based Education Programs for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse
A University–Community Partnership to Advance Research in Practice Settings
New Horizons of Translational Research and Research Translation in Social Work
Making Sense of Abuse
Academic Practitioner Partnerships
Social Work Research and Its Relevance to Practice
Secondary Traumatization, Burnout, and Vicarious Traumatization
Research–Practice Partnerships in Education
Beyond trauma-focused psychiatric epidemiology
Breaking the Silence of Child Sexual Abuse in the Caribbean
Treating sibling abuse families
Researching sensitive topics
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |