Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking National Well‐Being

Introducing a Measure of Wealth‐Adjusted Life Satisfaction in 116 Countries

Bibliographic Data

ID10901425
AuthorsMohsen Joshanloo (0000-0001-9350-6219, Department of Psychology Keimyung University Daegu South Korea, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume56
Issue1
Pages35-54
Publication date2026-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0046-2772 • E-ISSN: 1099-0992
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ejsp.70023
OpenAlexW4414066243
LanguageEN
References cited70

National life satisfaction scores are commonly used to compare well‐being across countries. However, they do not adequately account for significant differences in objective living conditions between nations. This study introduces wealth‐adjusted life satisfaction (WALS), a novel measure that captures how effectively countries convert economic resources into subjective well‐being. Using Gallup World Poll data from 116 countries, WALS was computed by residualizing national life satisfaction on gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Random Forest and cluster analyses revealed key predictors of WALS and identified distinct country clusters, respectively. Notably, some lower‐income countries (e.g., Nicaragua and Kyrgyzstan) scored high on WALS, whereas some high‐income countries (e.g., Bahrain and Japan) scored low. Key predictors of WALS include perceived job quality, experiences of enjoyment and autonomy, greater involvement in volunteering and greater opportunities for forming friendships. A distinct cluster of low‐wealth, high‐WALS countries was identified, characterized by collectivist and religious values, relatively high perceived job quality and strong prosocial engagement

Cluster (spacecraft) · Collectivism · Developing country · Life satisfaction · Product (mathematics) · Prosocial behavior · Quality of life (healthcare) · Subjective well-being · Cultural Differences and Values · Employment and Welfare Studies · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

  • Collectivism and coping

    Open Access•Ben C H Kuo•International Journal of Psychology•2013

  • Subjective well‐being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Louis Tay•International Journal of Psychology•2015

  • Algorithm as 136

    John A Hartigan, M Anthony Wong•Applied Statistics•1979

  • A random forest guided tour

    Open Access•Gérard Biau, Erwan Scornet•TEST•2016

  • The OECD Better Life Initiative

    Open Access•Martine Durand•Review of Income and Wealth•2015

  • Random Forests for Classification in Ecology

    Open Access•D Richard Cutler, Thomas C Edwards et al.•Ecology•2007

  • The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and Covid-19 cases and deaths

    Open Access•Michele J Gelfand, Joshua Conrad Jackson et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2021

  • MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data

    Open Access•Daniel J Stekhoven, Peter Bühlmann•Bioinformatics•2012

  • Values that Underlie and Undermine Well–Being

    Open Access•Florencia M Sortheix, Shalom H Schwartz•European Journal of Personality•2017

  • Ranger

    Open Access•Marvin N Wright, Andreas Ziegler•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being

    Ed Diener, Oishi et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2003

  • Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures

    Open Access•Michele J Gelfand, Jana L Raver et al.•Science•2011

  • Pattern of Human Concerns

    Hadley Cantril•Pattern of Human Concerns•1966

  • What Makes People Happy? Evidence from International Data

    Open Access•Mona Ahmadiani, Susana Ferreira et al.•Journal of Happiness Studies•2022

  • Cross-Cultural Analysis

    Michael Minkov•Cross-cultural analysis•2013

  • The Happiness-Economic Well-Being Nexus

    Open Access•Yok-Yong Lee, Kim Leng Goh•SAGE Open•2023

  • Thirteen Years of Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Mohsen Joshanloo•International Journal of Mental…•2023

  • Networks of Well-being in the Global South

    Open Access•Alude Mahali, Ingrid Lynch et al.•Journal of Developing Societies•2018

  • Re-understanding well-being in the Global South

    Open Access•Milda Longgeita Pinem, Tauchid Komara Yuda et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • A New Index of Perceived Job Quality in 116 Countries

    Open Access•Mohsen Joshanloo•Social Sciences•2023

  • Measuring the Rule of Law

    Open Access•Mila Versteeg, T Ginsburg•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations

    Peter Kuppens, Anu Realo et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Optimal human functioning around the world

    Open Access•Mohsen Joshanloo•British Journal of Psychology•2018

  • The religion paradox

    Ed Diener, Louis Tay et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • Advances in subjective well-being research

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Oishi et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2018

  • A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations

    Shalom H Schwartz, Shalom Schwartz•Comparative Sociology•2006

  • Against Happiness

    Frances Stewart•Journal of Human Development•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae