In the wake of Miller and Montgomery
A national view of people sentenced to juvenile life without parole
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10909504 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Z Bennett (NSW Department of Communities and Justice, corresponding author), Daphne M Brydon (0000-0002-4296-6079, University of Michigan), Jeffrey T Ward (0000-0003-1607-5392, Temple University), Dylan B Jackson (0000-0002-4726-6573, Johns Hopkins University), Leah Ouellet (0009-0003-1404-4346, Northwestern University), Rebecca Turner (0000-0001-7194-5464, Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Industrial), L S Abrams (0000-0002-0520-5801, University of California, Los Angeles) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 93 |
| Pages | 102199 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2352 • E-ISSN: 1873-6203 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102199 |
| OpenAlex | W4399377594 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 23 |
The movement to end mass incarceration has largely concentrated on people serving shorter sentences for non-violent offenses. There has been less consideration for the 1 in 7 people in prison serving life sentences, overwhelmingly for violent offenses, including those serving juvenile life without parole (JLWOP). Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions result in a pressing need for data on second chance considerations for JLWOP. This study tracks outcomes of the national population of juvenile lifers. We cross-reference data to identify the JLWOP population at the time of Miller ( N = 2904) to build a demographic profile and track resentencing, release, and mortality statuses . Statistics and data visualization are used to establish national and state-level baselines. Findings reveal more than 2500 individuals have been resentenced and more than 1000 have been released. There is notable state variation in the number of JLWOP sentences, the extent to which JLWOP is still allowed, sentence review mechanisms, and percentage of juvenile lifers released. The present study provides an important foundation for subsequent work to examine equity in the implementation of Miller and Montgomery within and across states, and to study reentry of an aging population that has spent critical life stages behind bars. • First comprehensive view of individuals sentenced to JLWOP (2904) pre- Miller. • Substantial state variation in resentencing and release practices exists. • Sets foundation for research and reform for persons serving life/long sentences
Aeronautics · Criminology · Juvenile · Miller · Political science · Wake · Aerospace Engineering · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Education Discipline and Inequality · Engineering · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
The good, the bad, the ugly
“There Was No Crib Notes on How to Grieve”
Understanding variation in juvenile life without parole legislation following Miller
Predicting parole for emerging adult lifers
Incarcerated as a child, reentering as an adult
The role of K-12 schools in sentencing children to life in prison
Parole outcomes in a developmental context
Thicker than blood
Prosecutor Decision-Making Following Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentencing Reform
Parole Revoked
Handbook of Life-Course Criminology
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives
Desistance from Offending in the Twenty-First Century
The power of the pen
Imperative for Inclusion of Long Termers and Lifers in Research and Policy
A first look at the reentry experiences of juvenile lifers released in Philadelphia
A Life-Course View of the Development of Crime
Consequences of mental and physical health for reentry and recidivism
The New Jim Crow
Legitimacy of parole as a consequence of policy shock
The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration
Incarceration and Health
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |