Revealed preferences for public goods
Applying a model of voter behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10928848 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Schram (0000-0002-1767-4998, Leiden University), Frans Van Winden (0000-0003-3713-2026, Leiden University) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 259-282 |
| Publication date | 1989-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Choice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-5829 • E-ISSN: 1573-7101 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00159397 |
| OpenAlex | W1995700152 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
Consumption (sociology · Democracy · Economics · Government (linguistics · Interpretation (philosophy · Macroeconomics · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Preference · Public choice · Public economics · Public finance · Public good · Revealed preference · Sociology · Voting · Voting behavior · Auction Theory and Applications · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law
Public goods provision in an experimental environment
Advances in the spatial theory of voting
The Changing Criteria of Economic Success
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
An Empirical Study of Politico-Economic Interaction in the United States
An Empirical Study of Politico-Economic Interaction in the United States
On the interaction between State and Private Sector
Multipart pricing of public goods
On the voting participation of public bureaucrats
Demands for public spending
Economic Conditions, Class and Voter Behavior
A New and Superior Process for Making Social Choices
A Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom
Politico‐economic Models in Competition with Alternative Models
An Outline for a Model of Party Choice
Memory for Past Vote
Economic Voting and the "Symbolic Politics" Argument
The Ecological Fallacy Revisited
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 2005 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |