Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Permitting States to Rescind Ratifications of Pending Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID10934514
AuthorsJohn R Vile
Year1990
Volume20
Issue2
Pages109-122
Publication date1990-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublius The Journal of Federalism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-5950 • E-ISSN: 1747-7107
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037867
OpenAlexW2327984330
LanguageEN

Among the troublesome questions still surrounding the U.S. constitutional amending process is whether states should be allowed to rescind ratifications of pending amendments. The Constitution is silent about this issue. Arguments from fairness and contemporary consensus, and concerns about hasty changes, support the acceptance of rescissions. Arguments for finality, the desirability of encouraging state legislatures to make serious decisions, and the difficulty of the current process suggest that rescissions should not be permitted, but these concerns are not as weighty as they might appear at first. A law accepting or rejecting all rescissions is preferable to a system where Congress makes partisan judgments in individual cases

Constitution · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Process (computing · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae