Problems in the Chronology and Genealogy of the XXIst Dynasty
New Proposals for their Interpretation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10960340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrzej Niwiński (0000-0002-1083-4792, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 49 |
| Publication date | 1979-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0065-9991 • E-ISSN: 2330-1880 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/40000317 |
| OpenAlex | W2330996687 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
period abounds. Although an almost unvarying body of sources for the chronology and genealogy of this period has been at our disposal for a long time, there is always the possibility of a new interpretation of the data. The best example is the considerable dissimilarity between the genealogical proposals of Kitchen and those presented by Cerny a few years ago. Intensive scientific discussion has eliminated some uncertainties, but there are still problems which merit further investigation and interpretation. In genealogy, the leading problems are: an explanation of the connections between the XXIst Dynasty and the Ramessides, and of the unclear position of the High Priest Pinudjem I; in chronology: the dilemma of the length of the reigns of Psusennes and Amenemope in the middle years of the dynasty. A very important category of sources for research into these problems is the coffins of the priests of Amun. The greater part of them originates from the so-called First and Second Find
Archaeology · Chronology · Genealogy · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.15 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |