The Property Qualifications of the Roman Classes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10988486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H Mattingly (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1937 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 99-107 |
| Publication date | 1937-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Roman Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0075-4358 • E-ISSN: 1753-528X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/297192 |
| OpenAlex | W2088827416 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
It is rapidly coming to be agreed among scholars that a re-dating of the earliest Roman coinage, centring round the transference of the denarius from 269 to circa 187 B.C., is now inevitable. Such a re-dating is bound to have very wide effects outside the coinage. The whole question of the expression of values in terms of money must come up for reconsideration. It is my object in this paper to concentrate on one part of the general question—the property qualifications of the Roman classes. The evidence is scanty and, for the earlier period, of problematic value. The figures of the Servian constitution, in particular, even if we admit them to have any real reference to early Roman history, must have been expressed in terms of money at a comparatively late date. Until we know when they began to be so expressed, we do not know what they really mean in value. Even our scanty records, however, if critically examined in their correct historical order, will yield definite results of a somewhat surprising character
Aesthetics · Art · Character (mathematics · Constitution · Economics · Epistemology · Expression (computer science · Linguistics · Literature · Object (grammar · Order (exchange · Period (music · Political science · Property (philosophy · Value (mathematics · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1985 - 2022 (38) |
| Highly cited | No |