The ‘Carlingford Culture’, the Long Barrow and the Neolithic of Great Britain and Ireland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11003493 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruaidhrí de Valéra (University College Dublin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1961 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Pages | 234-252 |
| Publication date | 1961-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0079-497X • E-ISSN: 2050-2729 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0079497x00016054 |
| OpenAlex | W2046210453 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
There are at the moment several indications that a re-assessment of the problems of the neolithic in Britain and Ireland is required. Since the virtual discovery of the primary neolithic some thirty years ago, so vast has the field become that it is no longer possible for an individual to be familiar with all the material and it is inevitable that each will tend to see the whole from the viewpoint of his own special interest and region. In these circumstances, during the course of any re-assessment, workers on various aspects are especially liable to find themselves at cross-purposes. Moreover, in the developments which followed the brilliant pioneer syntheses many ideas have become traditional and tend to be accepted as axiomatic. The alteration or abandonment of such ideas may prove difficult and more difficult still may be the emendation or rejection of conclusions based on them. Ireland lies to the west of Britain. To review the whole scene in any detail from a standpoint in Ireland would involve discussing at second-hand too much of the material on which current views are based and such is not the intention. These notes are designed merely to comment on some general issues which have been and may well in the future be sources of difficulty and misunderstanding, and in particular to deal with the Irish court cairns which have been the subject of recent discussion. It is scarcely to be hoped that they will obviate controversy, but they may help a little towards the mutual understanding of differences
Abandonment (legal · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Irish · Political science · Subject (documents · Archaeological and Geological Studies · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1966 - 2012 (47) |
| Highly cited | No |