Some Second Thoughts on the Third Anglo–Dutch War, 1672–1674
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11004241 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C R Boxer (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1969 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Pages | 67-94 |
| Publication date | 1969-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0080-4401 • E-ISSN: 1474-0648 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3678740 |
| OpenAlex | W1973210344 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
As the Professor of Modern History at Cambridge observed in his perceptive study of England and the Dutch Wars: ‘The wars themselves demonstrated not a few of the characteristics of modern warfare; there is a foretaste here of the bitter national feeling, the unscrupulous use of propaganda against the enemy, that were to become more familiar later. To some extent these weapons of war were deliberately manufactured and exploited by governments in the time of the Dutch wars, but equally certainly they were sometimes natural and spontaneous phenomena.’ Professor Charles Wilson confined his masterly analysis to the first two Anglo–Dutch wars. In this paper, I propose to consider the same points with reference to the third of these conflicts, and to trace in outline the major shifts and vagaries of public opinion on both sides of the North Sea
Adversary · Ancient history · Archaeology · Computer security · Economic history · Epistemology · Feeling · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public figure · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · TRACE (psycholinguistics) · Computer Science · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1995 - 2017 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |