Gender invariance of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20)

Bibliographic Data

ID11010959
AuthorsTahira Kootbodien (0000-0002-6454-9380, Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, University of Johannesburg, South Africa), Piet Becker (0000-0002-9384-6472, Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, South Africa), Nisha Naicker (0000-0001-7223-7881, Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, University of Johannesburg, South Africa), Angela Mathee (0000-0002-0060-829X, Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, University of Johannesburg, South Africa)
Year2015
Volume45
Issue3
Pages318-331
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth African Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0081-2463 • E-ISSN: 2078-208X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0081246315572500
OpenAlexW2105644762
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited32

The World Health Organization 20-item Self-Reporting Questionnaire is a quick, low-cost screening instrument for measuring common mental disorders and has been applied in community-based health surveys in developing countries. It was originally designed as a general single factor tool for assessing mental distress associated with several common mental disorders. However, studies have also examined alternate multi-factor solutions for the Self-Reporting Questionnaire–20 across diverse study populations. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in August and September 2009 among adults living in five urban communities in Johannesburg, South Africa ( n = 360). The Self-Reporting Questionnaire–20 was used to assess common mental disorders in the past month. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to compare three competing models (one-, two-, and three-factor models). All three models fit the data well. Gender invariance was tested on the one-factor model based on its extensive application in clinical and research settings. Our findings did not support gender invariance. The differences in factor loadings between male and female subgroups suggest that the application of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire–20 may be more suited to women and therefore should be used cautiously for the assessment of common mental disorders in South Africa urban populations

Confirmatory factor analysis · Distress · Measurement invariance · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychological distress · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub