Twitter Communication During an Outbreak of Hepatitis A in San Diego, 2016–2018
Bibliographic Data
Objectives. To examine how and what information is communicated via social media during an infectious disease outbreak. Methods. In the context of the 2016 through 2018 hepatitis A outbreak in San Diego County, California, we used a grounded theory–based thematic analysis that employed qualitative and quantitative approaches to uncover themes in a sample of public tweets (n = 744) from Twitter, a primary platform used by key stakeholders to communicate to the public during the outbreak. Results. Tweets contained both general and hepatitis A–specific information related to the outbreak, restatements of policy and comments critical of government responses to the outbreak, information with the potential to shape risk perceptions, and expressions of concern regarding individuals experiencing homelessness and their role in spreading hepatitis A. We also identified misinformation and common channels of content driving themes that emerged in our sample. Conclusions. Public health professionals may identify real-time public risk perceptions and concerns via social media during an outbreak and target responses that fulfill the informational needs of those who seek direction and reassurance during times of uncertainty
Computer security · Context (archaeology) · Environmental health · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Hepatitis · Hepatitis A · Misinformation · Outbreak · Pathology · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social media · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Medicine · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Risk Perception and Management · Virology
The Association between Message Framing and Intention to Vaccinate Predictive of Hepatitis A Vaccine Uptake
Psychological crisis and emergency response in public health emergencies
Covid-19, Genetics, and Risk
Exploring Sentiment, Values, and Misinformation Surrounding Vaccination Legislation on Twitter
A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients
A Work‐In‐Process Literature Review
Communicating on Twitter during a disaster
Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
Ebola on Instagram and Twitter
Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases
Mapping social activities and concepts with social media (Twitter) and web search engines (Yahoo and Bing)
Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting
Putting the fear back into fear appeals
Mercury, Vaccines, and Autism
Weaponized Health Communication
Effective Health Risk Communication About Pandemic Influenza for Vulnerable Populations
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |