Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Siahpush and Singh Respond

Bibliographic Data

ID11023348
AuthorsMohammad Siahpush (0000-0001-8799-034X, Gopal K. Singh is with the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md. Mohammad Siahpush is with the VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Carlton, Australia.), Gopal K Singh (0000-0002-7820-0323, Gopal K. Singh is with the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md. Mohammad Siahpush is with the VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Carlton, Australia.)
Year2003
Volume93
Issue5
Pages698-a-699
Publication date2003-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.93.5.698-a
OpenAlexW2012621106
LanguageEN
References cited4

Gessert’s critique complements our research. Whereas we emphasized social integration and structural explanations of the rural–urban disparities in suicide, Gessert suggests cultural explanations. Social structure and culture are intertwined. While some of the cultural values stated by Gessert may plausibly contribute to suicide rates, some may act as protective factors. For example, “emphasis on charity” can hardly be seen as leading to higher propensity to commit suicide. Similarly, distrusting government and authoritarianism may promote strong bonds and a cohesive subculture. A recent study of residents in disadvantaged communities suggests that in the face of exclusion from more affluent urban centers, they develop a strong sense of local identification and belonging and a feeling of pride in being able to cope with living in difficult conditions.1 The major message of our article was that rural–urban gradients in suicide mortality have been increasing. Gessert’s comments contribute to our understanding of the disparities in suicide mortality but do not explain why such disparities have been widening. Culture does not change as rapidly as economic and industrial structures or demographic forces, which, we contend, have contributed to changing patterns of rural–urban suicide disparity. The cultural factors listed by Gessert are not likely to have changed substantially in the past 3 decades and cannot be seen as affecting trends discussed in our article

Anomie · Commit · Criminology · Disadvantaged · Economic growth · Environmental health · Feeling · Government (linguistics) · Poison control · Political science · Pride · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • It's as if you’re locked in”

    Open Access•Miriam Stead, Susan Macaskill et al.•Health & Place•2001

  • Increasing Rural–Urban Gradients in US Suicide Mortality, 1970–1997

    Gopal K Singh, Mohammad Siahpush•American Journal of Public Health•2002

  • Zip Code Caveat

    Nancy Krieger, Pamela D Waterman et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2002

  • The Health Care Meanings, Values, and Practices of Anglo-American Males in the Rural Midwest

    Open Access•Sandra Courtney Seller, Sandra Courtney Sellers et al.•Journal of Transcultural Nursing•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae