Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Coalitions for Mutual Advantage

The Case of the Tobacco Institute’s Labor Management Committee

Bibliographic Data

ID11024055
AuthorsEdith D Balbach (Edith D. Balbach and Jocelyn Pan are with the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Elizabeth M. Barbeau is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Viola Manteufel is with the Community Health Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.), Elizabeth M Barbeau (Edith D. Balbach and Jocelyn Pan are with the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Elizabeth M. Barbeau is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Viola Manteufel is with the Community Health Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.), Viola Manteufel (Edith D. Balbach and Jocelyn Pan are with the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Elizabeth M. Barbeau is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Viola Manteufel is with the Community Health Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.), Jocelyn Pan (Edith D. Balbach and Jocelyn Pan are with the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Elizabeth M. Barbeau is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Viola Manteufel is with the Community Health Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.)
Year2005
Volume95
Issue6
Pages985-993
Publication date2005-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2004.052126
PMID15914820
PMCIDPMC1449295
OpenAlexW2026519611
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited17

In 1984, the tobacco workers’ union and the Tobacco Institute, which represents US tobacco companies, formed a labor management committee (LMC). The institute relied on LMC unions to resist smoke-free worksite rules. In a review of the internal tobacco industry documents now publicly available, we found that the LMC succeeded for 2 primary reasons. First, the LMC furthered members’ interests, allowing them to overcome institutional barriers to policy success. Second, the LMC used an “institutions, ideas, and interests” strategy to encourage non-LMC unions to oppose smoke-free worksite rules. While public health advocates missed an opportunity to partner with unions on the issue of smoke-free worksites during the era studied, they can use a similar strategy to form coalitions with unions

Business · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public relations · Tobacco control · Tobacco industry · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration

  • Public Health Under Attack

    Jenny White, Lisa A Bero et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

  • From strange bedfellows to natural allies

    Elizabeth M Barbeau, Graham Kelder et al.•Tobacco Control•2005

  • Unhealthy Partnerships

    Open Access•Annaebel Raebeck, Richard Campbell et al.•Journal of Immigrant and Minority…•2009

  • Political coalitions and working women

    Edith D Balbach, Abby Herzberg et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2006

  • Our Reach Is Wide by Any Corporate Standard”

    Laura E Tesler, Ruth E Malone•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • Labor Unions

    Beth Malinowski, Meredith Minkler et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • The Politics of Smoking in Federal Buildings

    Daniel M Cook, Lisa Bero•American Journal of Public Health•2009

  • Building Alliances in Unlikely Places

    Richard Campbell, Richard B Campbell et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2009

  • Manufacturing Credibility

    Richard Campbell, Richard B Campbell et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour

    Open Access•Caroline M Fichtenberg, Stanton A Glantz•BMJ•2002

  • Is Anyone Responsible?

    Shanto Iyengar•Is Anyone Responsible?•1991

  • Moral Politics

    George Lakoff•Moral Politics•2002

  • Tobacco industry documents

    Ruth E Malone•Tobacco Control•2000

  • Tobacco industry documents

    Edith D Balbach, Rebecca J Gasior et al.•Tobacco Control•2002

  • Smoke-Free Airlines and the Role of Organized Labor

    Jocelyn Pan, Elizabeth M Barbeau et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  • Public Health Under Attack

    Jenny White, Lisa A Bero et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

Citations per year0.41
Citation span2004 - 2015 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae